Jump to content


Photo

Good Old Fashioned Tank P*rn


  • Please log in to reply
3986 replies to this topic

#3981 Jim Warford

Jim Warford

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,153 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 March 2019 - 2202 PM

18595451_211284255227heuo2.jpg

 

So, these guys are firing over the tank's back deck...perhaps they're just assuming the "bad guys" have already gotten behind them...  


  • 0

#3982 Jim Warford

Jim Warford

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,153 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 March 2019 - 2210 PM

Another from Sofilein...

 


  • 0

#3983 Mikel2

Mikel2

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,338 posts

Posted 16 March 2019 - 0617 AM

It's nice to see the APG vehicles indoors at last.
  • 0

#3984 Interlinked

Interlinked

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 225 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cold war era tanks

Posted 16 March 2019 - 0727 AM

I wonder how much moderation she has to do. The comments under videos featuring WWII German militaria tend to not be as mild as the ones in these two videos.
  • 0

#3985 wlewisiii

wlewisiii

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 83 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2019 - 0016 AM

Let's see, youtube + fascist wannabes? Yeah, there'll be a sh**load of evil she has to nuke on every video.

 

Then you'll get the other wave of sh**birds who want to whine about a woman daring to want to know about tanks. 

 

Dudes, I was on the low end of strength as a tanker. Yet with the appropriate use of a tanker bar, sledge hammer and other such tools, I was able to do anything I had to do on my tank. If she had wanted to, SGM Lewis (my little sister) could probably have kicked my ass and been just as successful a tanker. If we had the T-72/T-80 in service, I have no doubt she would have been better than me if that was what she wanted to be. It would have been a task that I'd have contested so... Take that as you will.


  • 0

#3986 Panzermann

Panzermann

    REFORGER '79

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,430 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Teutonistan

Posted 17 March 2019 - 1411 PM

Let's see, youtube + fascist wannabes? Yeah, there'll be a sh**load of evil she has to nuke on every video.

 

Then you'll get the other wave of sh**birds who want to whine about a woman daring to want to know about tanks. 

 

Dudes, I was on the low end of strength as a tanker. Yet with the appropriate use of a tanker bar, sledge hammer and other such tools, I was able to do anything I had to do on my tank. If she had wanted to, SGM Lewis (my little sister) could probably have kicked my ass and been just as successful a tanker. If we had the T-72/T-80 in service, I have no doubt she would have been better than me if that was what she wanted to be. It would have been a task that I'd have contested so... Take that as you will.

 

 

I think one of our brit section relayed, that the tools on the Challenger 2 were developed wiht the input of a woman who was working at the Bovington museum. Which resulted in longer bars for more leverage and less strength needed and such. IIRC of course.


  • 0

#3987 DB

DB

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,956 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hertfordshire, England

Posted 18 March 2019 - 0838 AM

New UK Armed Forces equipment is subject to anthropometric design rules that state it must be operable and maintainable by a defined demographic drawn from a Human Factors Integration technical guide.

Typically the requirement is 5th to 95th percentile service personnel of both genders, target 3rd to 97th.

Obviously 5th percentile female army personnel won't be the same as 5th percentile gen pop females.

Incidentally, there is no complete correlation allowing one to equate, say, a 50th percentile female with a 5th/10th/whatever male, it's more complicated than that.
  • 0




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (1)