Jump to content


Photo

In Syria


  • Please log in to reply
15297 replies to this topic

#15281 Nobu

Nobu

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,030 posts

Posted 19 October 2019 - 1613 PM

Erdogan commanding the Turkish army to clear a 30km buffer zone between Turkey and Kurdish-held Syria is something that the United States might want to consider along its border with the failing narcostate otherwise known as Mexico.


  • 0

#15282 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,734 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0207 AM

They did that in 1848. :)


  • 0

#15283 seahawk

seahawk

    military loving leftist peace monkey

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,837 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0225 AM

Erdogan commanding the Turkish army to clear a 30km buffer zone between Turkey and Kurdish-held Syria is something that the United States might want to consider along its border with the failing narcostate otherwise known as Mexico.

 

True and that is along the line Trump laid out right from the start.


  • 0

#15284 Wouter2

Wouter2

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 171 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0500 AM

Erdogan commanding the Turkish army to clear a 30km buffer zone between Turkey and Kurdish-held Syria is something that the United States might want to consider along its border with the failing narcostate otherwise known as Mexico.

It's not a buffer zone in the conventional sense, Erdogan wants to resettle 2 million Syrians there. And if it is "only" 30 km's it will still end up bordering YPG-lands (even though cities like Kobane would be taken and repopulated, the original inhabitants presumably displaced or killed), so there is no buffer. He is simply expanding the Ottoman califate, as a Belgian/Turkish member of his army proudly called it on social media.

 

Erdogan is also blowing hot and cold about Manbji and Kobane and other places where the SAA (and/or Russians) are present. At the one hand he says presence of the Syrian regime forces is good and no problem for Turkey (presumably because the Kurds are not in power anymore at those places), on the other hand he continues to insist that those places will be taken.


Edited by Wouter2, 20 October 2019 - 1426 PM.

  • 0

#15285 bojan

bojan

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,700 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0849 AM

...He is simply expanding the Ottoman califate...

Told that years ago. It is a blatant aggression on the other country, yet none cared until now (and cynical me would say that deep down they only care because it can be used for a "Orange man bad" rhetoric), when it is basically too late.


Edited by bojan, 20 October 2019 - 0851 AM.

  • 0

#15286 Roman Alymov

Roman Alymov

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,513 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0920 AM

 

...He is simply expanding the Ottoman califate...

Told that years ago. It is a blatant aggression on the other country, yet none cared until now (and cynical me would say that deep down they only care because it can be used for a "Orange man bad" rhetoric), when it is basically too late.

 

Note nobody cares about Turkey, NATO member and EU candidate, openly threatening Europe with weaponising refugees etc. I remember how loud were screams of "Putin weaponising refuges " here....

Photo by Rus war correspondent taken on abandoned US base in Syria

73294818_2355794751348648_36583442180672


  • 0

#15287 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,128 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0921 AM

Sultan is trying to claw back sonething after Idlib is lost. He is unwilling to fight SAA-Iran-Rus for it. The West is only angsting because the narrative is collapsing. Hilarious airlift of addorted SF out of Qamishli and MRAPS being thermited. McRaven freaking out as his paper kingdom collapses.
  • 0

#15288 Roman Alymov

Roman Alymov

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,513 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0924 AM

Another photo from US base - some kind of unofficial slogan&

73404049_2355789231349200_75078833377221


  • 0

#15289 Daan

Daan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,124 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 0930 AM

That is the Texan 'Come and take it'  flag, dating from the Battle of Gonzales. https://en.wikipedia...ome_and_take_it


  • 0

#15290 Roman Alymov

Roman Alymov

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,513 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 1111 AM

Tartus, Sep 18 2019  - new load of old tanks delivered via "Tartus express"

https://pbs.twimg.co...t34?format=jpg


Edited by Roman Alymov, 20 October 2019 - 1111 AM.

  • 0

#15291 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,128 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 1233 PM

Blurry! T62M?
  • 0

#15292 Roman Alymov

Roman Alymov

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,513 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 1320 PM

Blurry! T62M?

Yes, seems like Т-62 (can't see if it is M or not)


  • 0

#15293 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,593 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 1414 PM

Sultan is trying to claw back sonething after Idlib is lost. He is unwilling to fight SAA-Iran-Rus for it. The West is only angsting because the narrative is collapsing. Hilarious airlift of addorted SF out of Qamishli and MRAPS being thermited. McRaven freaking out as his paper kingdom collapses.

 

The West = mebbe the US. Regime change as a low hanging fruit is ok, but to break down NATO to argue over a piece of Syria? nope. Less so after 2014.


  • 0

#15294 Brian Kennedy

Brian Kennedy

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,398 posts

Posted 20 October 2019 - 2014 PM

Sultan is trying to claw back sonething after Idlib is lost. He is unwilling to fight SAA-Iran-Rus for it. The West is only angsting because the narrative is collapsing. Hilarious airlift of addorted SF out of Qamishli and MRAPS being thermited. McRaven freaking out as his paper kingdom collapses.

McRaven retired in 2014 but please, keep going.


  • 0

#15295 Nobu

Nobu

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,030 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:44 AM

They did that in 1848. :)

 

Effectively, I might add  :D

 

Interestingly, I would agree that it is along the lines of what Trump's Mexico policy is based on. The Syrian example may not be a buffer zone, but Erdogan's suboptimal alternative would be fortifying his border and staying inside of them.


  • 0

#15296 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nonbiri

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,042 posts

Posted Yesterday, 07:09 AM

Rasalayn.jpg


  • 0

#15297 BansheeOne

BansheeOne

    Bullshit filter overload, venting into civility charger

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14,307 posts

Posted Today, 04:03 AM

Well, the CDU/CSU foreign policy spokesman in the German Bundestag, Roderich Kiesewetter, pointed out yesterday that if people really wanted to protect the Kurds, diplomatic maneuvers wouldn't help as much as a UN humanitarian security zone guarded by the EU with a mere 30-40,000 troops, including German. Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer followed that up with the announcement that she would seek talks with France, the UK and US at the upcoming meeting of her NATO colleagues for a solution in coordination with Turkey and Russia; though she was evasive on possible German military commitments, saying that would be a question for parliament (in fact the Bundestag can merely vote yes or no on deployments proposed by the government, without modification).

 

I'm not sure if those are serious intentions or merely trolling the coalition partner and most of the opposition, who have talked a good deal about how bad the Turkish intervention is and that Erdogan should not be let get away with it, complaining that Germany is acting impotently - but are typically reluctant when it comes to military action of its own. Most demands have been for various sanctions, and in fact Angela Merkel has announced that no arms will be delivered to Turkey under present conditions.

 

It would be fun to see how the Left Party in particular, which has always been the loudest champion of the Kurds, would try to handle the proposal of German soldiers protecting them when they are also pretty strictly anti-military deployment, and anti-military period. Though I don't doubt they would come up with a completely paradox position having it both ways, like when MP Christine Buchholz (Hezbollah, Offenbach) famously called for solidarity with resistance in besieged Kobane, and stopping US bombing in their support. That triggered no end of ridicule, of course.

 

10606063_736143033106622_891918182899417

 

30-40,000 troops per Kiesewetter is of course either playing it very safe, or deliberately raising the stakes very high; I can't see a Europe that's just reorienting towards the East again - or in fact any other actor - bringing up that kind of numbers. As the protection factor of the removed US troops was political rather than military anyway (that is, until Trump showed he'll readily yield to demands of a third-rate sorta-ally to get out of the way), a high four-digit number would probably be sufficient for this role. That might actually be doable, but I'm not holding my breath just yet.


  • 0

#15298 Der Zeitgeist

Der Zeitgeist

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,277 posts

Posted Today, 04:17 AM

(...) though she was evasive on possible German military commitments, saying that would be a question for parliament (in fact the Bundestag can merely vote yes or no on deployments proposed by the government, without modification).

 

Classic German MoD/Bundeswehr line, "we don't formulate policy, we only act upon what the Bundestag tells us to do". :rolleyes:


  • 0