Jump to content


Photo

"kvartz" Ceramic Inserts In The T-72M1 Turret


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Interlinked

Interlinked

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cold war era tanks

Posted 07 April 2019 - 0950 AM

Here's some information from a Polish university about the casting technology used in Poland for the production of T-72M1 turrets.

 

This information is available because of the efforts of Jarosław Wolski, known online as "Militarysta". We've had several long discussions about the composition and physical properties of the "Kvartz" filler inside the turrets of T-72A and T-72M1 tanks and the method of constructing the turrets (it was mostly him educating me). We know that the composite filler of the T-72A/M1 turret is embedded inside the turret cheek cavities during the casting process of the turret itself, and that the "Kvartz" filler is a sintered ceramic block that acts as a casting insert during this casting process. We know that the "Kvartz" blocks are made by sintering quartz sand with several additives at a temperature of 1,200°C at high pressure, but without knowing the ingredients of the compound, accurate estimations of its physical properties were not possible. Until this information becomes publicly available, this document will remain one of the best sources.

 

 

https://i.imgur.com/OlAgBjP.jpg

 

Original document obtained and photographed by Piotr Zbies, an engineerTranslations by Jarosław:

 

Title:

Odlewnictwo. Technologia wykonywania form i rdzeni - skrypt nr 1747 Politechniki Śląskiej. Gliwice 1993
Casting. The technology of making molds and cores - script No. 1747 of the Silesian University of Technology. Gliwice City 1993

 

Table names
"rodzaj i przeznaczenie masy" = type and purpose of the filler 
"osnowa ziarnowa" = grain matrix 
"materiał wiążący" = binding material 
"dodatki" = additives
"wilgoci % wag"  = moisture content in % of mass 
 
The last row in the table describes the "Kvartz" casting/armour insert as used in Polish T-72M1 tanks. 
 
"Masa przymodelowa na formy do ciężkich i bardzo ciężkich odlewów staliwnych" = Modular mass for molds for heavy and very heavy cast steel
 
 
  • Second Column (grain matrix), last row
"szamot odlewniczy Sz01-III 75-85" = "Casting Material Sz01-III", 75-85% content by mass
 
This material is composed of Quartz sand with a 30% content of aluminum oxide and titanium dioxide.
 
 
  • Third Column (binding material), last row 
"glina GM1-I" - 12 -15= "clay GM1-I", 12-15% content by mass
 
 
  • Fourth Column (additives), last row

"grafit lub mielone elektrody 3÷10" = graphite or ground electrodes 3÷10

"woda do uzyskania wymaganej zawartości wilgoci" = water to obtain the required moisture content 

 

 

  • Fifth Column (moisture content in % of mass), last row

 

10÷12

 

 

How closely this corresponds to other T-72M1 and T-72A turrets is hard to determine. I'd say that it depends on how much technology transfer occurred when Poland bought the licence for the T-72M1 and if they had to make significant modifications to adjust the technology to suit their manufacturing capabilities.


  • 0

#2 sunday

sunday

    Bronze-age right-wing delusional retard

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Badalona, Spain
  • Interests:Technology, History

Posted 07 April 2019 - 1211 PM

Anyone knows how is this different from the siliceous core armor specified for the MBT-70?


  • 0

#3 Interlinked

Interlinked

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cold war era tanks

Posted 07 April 2019 - 1314 PM

Anyone knows how is this different from the siliceous core armor specified for the MBT-70?

 

I don't know if there are differences between this and the siliceous core armour developed during the 1950's that has been quite thoroughly documented, but if they are the same, then the answer would be relatively straightforward. One is a glass and one is a ceramic. They don't interact with shaped charge jets the same way.


  • 0

#4 methos

methos

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 882 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 April 2019 - 1328 PM

Anyone knows how is this different from the siliceous core armor specified for the MBT-70?

 

There was never siliceous-cored armour specified for the MBT-70 project. The plans to use such armour were stopped with the XM60 tank developpment. It is fused silica glass and not comparable to the kvartz armour.


  • 0

#5 sunday

sunday

    Bronze-age right-wing delusional retard

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Badalona, Spain
  • Interests:Technology, History

Posted 07 April 2019 - 1438 PM

Thanks.
  • 0

#6 TTK Ciar

TTK Ciar

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,944 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sebastopol, CA, USA
  • Interests:material engineering, composite armor, GPC, battletank technology

Posted 07 April 2019 - 2129 PM

The clay/graphite ratio looks appropriate to me for making a clay bonded carbon refractory binder comparable to that investigated here: http://ciar.org/h/10...20150402.02.pdf

The ratio used in the insert (80% clay / 20% graphite) is somewhat higher than what was used in the publication (up to 70% clay) but they tell us what to expect from this higher ratio: reduced porosity, increased modulus, increased energy absorption and increased compressive strength. All good things.

A pity the university document doesn't mention sintering temperature. The IJME publication claims the optimal temperature is near 700degC, and another point of congruence would have been satisfying.

Edited by TTK Ciar, 07 April 2019 - 2130 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users