Jump to content


Photo

China's Peaceful Rise

wink wink nudge nudge

  • Please log in to reply
2529 replies to this topic

#21 Colin

Colin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,947 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 0133 AM

chino

You might see my niece in a upcoming movie, see plays an reporter interviewing Mao through a translator. Her lines were in English, but the script handed to her was in Mandarin. she is currently living in Beijing and working as a actress while learning Mandarin.  


  • 0

#22 Corinthian

Corinthian

    Stone Age Bitter Delusional Retard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,347 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 0316 AM

Colin: Wot movie is dat? ^_^

 

JasonJ: :wub: :wub: :wub:


  • 0

#23 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 0827 AM

Colin: Wot movie is dat? ^_^

 

JasonJ: :wub: :wub: :wub:

Shush Tomas, that's Colin's young niece he's talking about.

 

@Colin, congrats, I will look out for it. Similar question - whatsit called?


  • 0

#24 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 0952 AM

One similarity I have with firefly1 is that I am not a CCP supporter.

 

But I can't help but feel defensive when I encounter people with a lot of hate for China. C'mon admit it, don't make excuses like "I only hate the CCP" etc... You hate China. We know. They know. It's out in the open. We saw how Westerners everywhere tried to disrupt the 2008 Olympics and Steven Spielberg pulled out of an agreement to work for the Beijing Olympics. And the Chinese collectively probably deserve or "earned" much of the hate. But much of this negative image is also undeserved.

 

China, is a PR disaster - so much for Communists being good at propaganda... They have no clue how to groom their own image. Their leaders do not speak English, and so cannot become personable to a western public.

 

To go into a list of US bad deeds vs China bad deeds would be pedantic but you will find that the US keep getting away with murder, compared to China. Over and over again. While China stupidly has a loud bark but a very weak bite and has bitten far less times than... well, many others. Yet it is deemed the biggest threat globally, "current most evil nation" status etc despite not having occupied or shot at any foreign nation for decades.

 

Sigh... the SCS or even Diaoyu, are a bunch of uninhabited isles. Please do not jump to the conclusion that China is next ready to invade the Philippines proper. No. The last thing they need is to go into a nation over-flowing with heavily-armed civilians, bandits and insurgents. (no offense, Tomas) They've got enough shit to deal with WRT Xinjiang and Tibet rebellion, whose insurgents either so far have no access to firearms - impossible - or simply hoarding it for the "big one".

 

Not saying China claiming the SCS is acceptable, I've always staunchly maintained it isn't. But they're not bombing civilians, or mowing down homes to get to these natural resources. Treat it for what it really is: a greedy grab for resources in uninhabited territories.

 

Apart from SCS, China's other major PR disaster is the continued subjugation of the quaint and vastly-popular people of Tibet. Western people see the Tibet people and culture, and feel immediate sympathy for the Tibetans. Like wanting to protect a child. Add to that the masterful PR from Dalai Lamma.

 

The Chinese surely must understand that a people as fanatically religious as the Tibetans can never be completely subjugated. The only way is to corrupt them with wealth and prosperity. But this takes a long time and meanwhile, they should really work with the Dalai Lamma rather than to vilify him. When he dies, the next exiled Tibetan leader would not be as prepared to come to a peaceful compromise with China. Already, the Tibetans seemed prepared to accept some kind of Chinese governance, but why introduce rampant Han Chinese settlement of their homeland?

The same goes for Xinjiang, which is an even bigger time bomb that cannot be defused.

 

But even there in Tibet, their oppression nowhere near as brutal, murderous and utterly destructive as the US' occupation of Iraq. The PLA in Tibet are no saints since make no mistake this is a forced military subjugation of an occupied people. But the PLA is still nowhere near as murderous as many other occupational armies even after large scale interracial riots/massacres against the Han Chinese etc. But the CCP can't get away with it like the popular US can. OK, I just broke my own promise not to go into a US vs China item by item discussion.

 

Yes, Freedom. China curtailed especially western press freedom in places like Tibet and Xinjiang. Why? Do you actually expect Western press to give a fair reporting? Even when clearly a massacre of Han Chinese people has occurred, the western press prefers to tell the story of the oppressed Tibetans or Uyghurs. Or the famous case of a picture of Chinese riot police looking menacing, but with the Tibetan monk throwing a molotov cocktail cropped out of the picture by BBC or CNN. Maybe it is not even the journalists' desire to distort. But back home, the story of evil China oppressing the poor Tibetans sells more copies.

 

WRT Jason's frequently saying that China has no "basic freedoms"... I don't know what to say. I have a very selfish POV but I actually am very happy that freedoms are curtailed. If you've lived here long enough, maybe you'll feel the same way too, maybe not... I don't know. If China becomes a democracy like India, with freedoms of all kinds granted... the country may well become unlivable. Every country has trouble makers but with the huge population of China, even if a small percentage go out of control, it would be a massive problem.

 

There are some points here I like to make comparing China to India. China isn't fragmented and divided along as many lines - racial, language, wealth, religious, geographical, castes - like India. Rioting by Tamils or low-castes in the south will be ignored or even suppressed by Hindi-speakers or high-borns of the north, as a clumsy example. In China, everyone speaks the same language, are not divided along religious lines (in general) and even the poorest have access to a mobile phone and the internet. The only obvious division is that of a wealthy minority vs the middle class or poor majority. So a little spark of an idea - like the same one of 1989 - can spread like wildfire across the entire China grounding it to a halt. This danger is ever more likely with more and more becoming jobless and the income gap widens.

 

Freedom is wayy... overrated and I hate how the West keep using it as a stick to beat the Chinese. Many of you know about the control and corruption etc that occurs in China and therefore feels the CCP should be ousted etc.

 

But China has NEVER once, in its history been a nation of freedoms. China today is more free than it has EVER been in its long tumultuous history. You'd be fooling yourself to think that Chinese people here are suffering under a despotic regime like never before and are ready to rise up and overthrow the government etc.

 

No.

 

People aren't killed off or spirited away to labour camps for the slightest infringement. If you don't raise the ire of the regime - repeatedly - you can live very comfortably, holiday in France and even buy a Maserati or two. I've never seen so many fucking Maseratis, Lamborghinis, Hummers etc in my whole life as in Shanghai.

 

And also take note that people whom are oppressed in China DO protest and riot, and this is on the increase.

 

But another country, which has a very distinct and discriminating class system, where slavery of the poorest is standard, and women get burnt alive daily, deadly rapes are an epidemic and generally very high crime rates, a hopeless police force, unimaginable scale of corruption, child prostitution commonplace, high infant mortality, high illiteracy, many armed insurgencies and banditry.... is well-liked and supported by the West. Simply because it has a "democratic" label.

 

Of course I'm talking about India.

 

Nobody beats India with the "freedoms" or "human rights" stick yet it is the serious offender on both issues. No, just wear the "democracy" label and you'd be absolved.

 

India's democracy is not a true democracy like you find in developed places like Taiwan, Korea and Japan. At best, democracy in India is for those who can afford it. For the 90% of the country that lives in rural areas or in poverty, their votes are given to whomever wields the biggest stick to beat them, or whomever gives more cash incentives at the polling stations. Either way the poor lose. Theirs is a battle at subsistence level. Who talks about political freedom when you have to sell your daughter off so the son can eat for another week? When Indians protest about police or government corruption they get beaten up by the police or thrown in jail just like in China. But only China is the human rights abuser and oppressor of freedoms.

 

But I'll stop myself from saying that what India need is a good dictatorship, because even that can also go either way.

 

I can't think of an alternative government type that would suit China. The Western saying "If it ain't broke..." truly applies here. No matter how much freedoms a "democracy" like India offers, I really, really, really wouldn't want to be a Indian citizen. Especially after I have seen and experienced what a "no freedoms" country like China can offer.

 

It's not just because I am more well-off than the average Chinese that I say this. Even if I was a poor farmer, I would rather be a poor farmer in China than India or any other so-called democracies you find in Asia. There are poor people everywhere including the West and the poor inadvertently gets screwed over. But at least in a so-called no freedom country like China, the poor are more free than those living in indentured slavery in India. And the poor in China very often fought back, and are still around to talk about it.


Edited by chino, 05 August 2014 - 1147 AM.

  • 0

#25 urbanoid

urbanoid

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,412 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1118 AM

WRT Jason's frequently saying that China has no "basic freedoms"... I don't know what to say. I have a very selfish POV but I actually am very happy that freedoms are curtailed. If you've lived here long enough, maybe you'll feel the same way too, maybe not... I don't know. If China becomes a democracy like India, with freedoms of all kinds granted... the country may well become unlivable. Every country has trouble makers but with the huge population of China, even if a small percentage go out of control, it would be a massive problem.

 

It almost sounds as if you were afraid that the Chinese are somehow 'worse' than Japanese or (South) Koreans, who do just fine with democracy despite never experiencing it before 1940s and 1980s (in practice 1990s) respectively. Culturally the Chinese are much closer to Japanese or Koreans than to Indians, aren't they? And just over the straits you have a Republic of CHINA, first a part of the mainland (no democracy), than a Japanese colony (no democracy) and later a separate dictatorship (no democracy), that had undergone a successful democratisation not so long ago. In the near future they may even democratically decide that they are first and foremost Taiwanese (a matter of time IMHO).

 

The number of population as an argument? Sorry, I'm not buying it.


Edited by urbanoid, 05 August 2014 - 1118 AM.

  • 0

#26 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nonbiri

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,040 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1130 AM

One similarity I have with firefly1 is that I am not a CCP supporter.

 

But I can't help but feel defensive when most westerners are almost rabid with hate for China. C'mon admit it, don't make excuses like I only hate the CCP etc... You hate China and Chinese people. We know. And they probably deserve or "earned" much of the hate. But so much of this negative image is also undeserved.

 

China, is a PR disaster - so much for Communists being good at propaganda... They have no clue how to groom their own image. To go into a list of US bad deeds vs China bad deeds would be pedantic but you can see with your own eyes - if you choose to - that the US can literally get away with murder. While China stupidly has a loud bark but a very weak bite and has bitten far less times than... well many others. Yet it is deemed the biggest threat globally etc.

 

Apart from SCS, China's other major PR disaster is the continued subjugation of a quaint and vastly-popular culture like Tibet. The Chinese surely must understand that a people as fanatically religious as the Tibetans can never be completely subjugated. They should really work with the Dalai Lamma rather than to vilify him. When he dies, the next exiled Tibetan leader would not be as prepared to come to a peaceful solution. Already, the Tibetans seemed prepared to accept some kind of Chinese governance, but why introduce rampant Chinese settlement of these places?

The same goes for Xinjiang, which is an even bigger time bomb.

 

But even there in Tibet, their oppression nowhere near brutal, murderous and utterly destructive as the US' occupation of Iraq. They're not saints since make no mistake this is a forced military subjugation. But nowhere near as murderous even after large scale interracial riots/massacres etc. But they can't get away with it like the media-savvy US can. OK, I just broke my own promise not to go into a US vs China item by item discussion.

 

WRT Jason's constantly saying that China has no "basic freedoms"... I don't know what to say. I have a very selfish POV but I actually am very happy that freedoms are curtailed. If you've lived here long enough, maybe you'll understand, maybe not... I don't know. But if China becomes a democracy like India, with freedoms of all kinds granted... the country may become unlivable. Every country has trouble makers but with the huge population of China, even if a small percentage go out of control, it would be on a massive scale.

 

There are some points here I like to make comparing China to India. China isn't fragmented and divided along as many lines - racial, language, wealth, religious, geographical, castes - like India. Rioting by Tamils in the south will be ignored or even suppressed by Hindi-speakers of the north, as a clumsy example. In China, everyone speaks the same language, have no religious affiliations (in general) and even the poorest have access to a mobile phone and the internet. The only obvious division is the wealth of a minority vs the middle class or poor majority. So a little spark of an idea - like the same one of 1989 - can spread like wildfire across the entire China. And a Chinese rabble are as easy to rouse as any other cultures.

 

Freedom is wayy... overrated and I hate how the West keep using it as a stick to beat the Chinese. Many of you know about the control and corruption etc that occurs in China and therefore feels the CCP should be ousted etc.

 

China has NEVER once, in its history been a nation of freedoms. China today is more free than it has ever been in its long history. You'd be fooling yourself to think that the people here are suffering under a despotic regime and are ready to overthrow the government etc. People aren't killed off or spirited away to labour camps by their thousands etc. If you don't raise the ire of the regime you can live very comfortably, holiday in France and even buy a Maserati or two.

 

But another country, which has a very distinct and discriminating class system, where slavery of the poorest is standard, and women get burnt alive daily, deadly rapes are an epidemic and generally very high crime rates, a hopeless police force, unimaginable scale of corruption, child prostitution commonplace, high infant mortality, high illiteracy.... is well-liked and supported by the West. Simply because it has a "democratic" system.

 

Of course I'm talking about India.

 

India's democracy is not a true democracy like you find in Taiwan, Korea and Japan. (Oh btw Taiwan is an indisputable part of China, historically, geographically, culturally etc.) At best, democracy in India is for those who can afford it. For the 90% of the country that lives in rural areas or in poverty, their votes are given to whomever wields the biggest stick to beat them, or whomever gives more cash incentives at the voting stations. Either way they lose. Their's is a battle at subsistence level, why talk about political freedom when you have to sell your daughter off so the son can eat for another week?

 

But I'll stop myself from saying that what they need is a good dictatorship, because even that can also go either way.

 

I can't think of an alternative government type that would suit China. The Western saying "If it ain't broke..." truly applies here. No matter how much freedoms a "democracy" like India offers, I really, really, really wouldn't want to be a Indian citizen. Especially after I have seen and experienced what a "no freedoms" country like China can offer.

 

It's not just because I am more well-off than the average Chinese that I say this. Even if I was a poor farmer, I would rather be a poor farmer in China than India or any other so-called democracies you find in Asia. There are poor people everywhere including the West and the poor inadvertently gets screwed over. But at least in a so-called no freedom country like China, the poor are more free than those living in indentured slavery in India. And the poor in China very often fought back, and are still around to talk about it.

 

Thank you for taking the time to write that.

 

To be clear on myself, I don't hate China. I feel frustrated with their clumsy international policies. Very frustrated. I want to see a peaceful co-existing and prosperous East Asia. A region back to the 3 core cultures of China, Korea, and Japan with a modern dynamic. Why?? no idea. Well I do have an idea why but to keep it short, it just feels right and I care about what is right and about this particular region. So the frustrations I have may sometimes appear as hate. It is not hate. I sincerely do hope for the best for China, which is also the best for Korea and Japan. South Korea and Japan have faults too. A quick one I'll throw out is Takeshima. It should be returned to South Korea as a sincere and symbolic meaning that Japan truly wants to move past the age of imperialism with respect to Korea. But it has dragged on for so long and now South Korea is "illegally" occupying it which makes any return impossible in the mid-term. Its the wrong way to convince Japan to return it to South Korea. And it has totally killed the Korean wave of music, TV, fashion, that was flowing through Japan. The music wave was so great that it still managed to linger quite awhile despite the stupid island. Anyway..

 

So China can do what they want internally, but if we are talking about which country is best suited as a hegemonic power, the US with its multicultural and freedom is most suitable. That does demand responsibility and dedication. The US is not without its issues. Iraq was a disaster. That does take points away from the US as the preferred hegemonic power. I'll get back to this point. Pardon my incoherence.

 

About the freedom as overrated, for me personally, I do value it. I really like to be able to research what I want, make decisions about what I want, say whatever I want, doubt what I want, question anything I want, and criticize whatever I want. I care about truths. The actual facts and all the facts of a giving topic. The pursuit to this knowledge gaining and rhetorical speaking skill requires freedom. It is wonderful thing for a person to exercise these things and to go on improving themselves more and more in their life time. It truly elevates the person to great character. Hiding facts, lies, dishonesty, and so on, impede that progress.

 

So next is where I can concede some ground to you Chino and for China's way. Looking at America, I don't see a majority of people willing to use the freedoms to the maximum potential. Much of it is wasted or perverted. The freedom is such a great thing that using it appropriately seems too difficult for many people since the freedom also has whispers of temptations in detrimental and unproductive behavior. A little too pessimistic perhaps on my part. On the other side, I think some people are more comfortable with limits and boundaries on the society their reside in. I felt that maybe you were like this and thus feel ok with limited freedoms at least with the way it is in China. So now I know :) And such limited freedoms may offer some things not possible in a free society. I can imagine it. (Just had a minor earthquake tremor).

 

So then comes a connection that I sometimes allude to I think. Could PRC's limitations on freedom be directly linked to the clumsy international policies? I do not know, but I feel it may be the case. With limited knowledge and limitations in what a person can say or do makes the person easier to control and more gullible but also requires more maintenance. In order for the government to maintain its image of consistency, of cohesion, and of legitimacy, it will have to either cover up or carry out actions that cause trouble in other areas. For example, If China builds up the anti-Japanese propaganda strictly for internal consumption, and then if Japan does something, then China will have to respond to Japan in a way that upholds its internal propaganda. If the PRC does not respond in the way that its propaganda would imply, then its propaganda loses credibility and thus, the PRC government's words loses credibility. Or is this analysis flawed somewhere?

 

Going back to the US, on the point on phony "democracies". Its a well made point. Iraq was grossly underestimated or it had different purpose totally hidden that had no care for Iraq's future. Both cases I disagree with. Even back in 2003, I had my suspicions about the whole Iraq thing, as ignorant as I was. Something just didn't seem right. Afghanistan was ok and I could still support its decision despite its outcome. I have pointed out before sometime ago about the growth of South Korea in the 1960s. They had a flimsy democracy but it couldn't get much done. Park overthrew it and put in place his dictatorship-like power and started the rapid build up of South Korea's economy. For 3rd world countries, democracy, for the most part, just can't function it seems. But at some point, when a country enters into 1st world status, democracy is probably required. South Korea successfully made that transition. With that came new freedoms into history and what not. It is what caused the comfort women issue to surface after so long. Simply said, and if I am getting this right, the South Korea government suppressed freedom of information so that such information couldn't disrupt the economy build-up. So the comfort women issue couldn't surface during the 50s to 80s.

 

Well anyway, to sum up, if PRC did not have such clumsy foreign policies, I would have more confidence in China's way in internal affairs. I see PRC's clumsy foreign policies as the biggest cause to the raise in tensions in the region and to Japan reinterpreting its constitution. The escalations need to tone down, ASAP if possible. That requires China dropping the SCS and Senkaku claims. They can continue the military modernization part. I'm not arguing about that part. They deserve a military fitting for their size. Can the SCS and Senkaku claim be dropped without losing face with its own population? The US government can endure such embarrassments. It is flexible. Can the PRC government? Does the lack of freedom also mean a lack of flexibility?


  • 0

#27 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1206 PM

It almost sounds as if you were afraid that the Chinese are somehow 'worse' than Japanese or (South) Koreans, who do just fine with democracy despite never experiencing it before 1940s and 1980s (in practice 1990s) respectively. Culturally the Chinese are much closer to Japanese or Koreans than to Indians, aren't they? And just over the straits you have a Republic of CHINA, first a part of the mainland (no democracy), than a Japanese colony (no democracy) and later a separate dictatorship (no democracy), that had undergone a successful democratisation not so long ago. In the near future they may even democratically decide that they are first and foremost Taiwanese (a matter of time IMHO).

 

The number of population as an argument? Sorry, I'm not buying it.

 

Japan is a highly disciplined society. It has an Emperor that is almost a God.

 

Please come to live in China and experience grown men pushing your 4 yr-old child out of the way as they rush into a train. It happened to me just over the weekend in a countryside railway station. Or people rioting inside a closed up airplane because air-traffic control delays the flight. Again, both are personal experiences, but you can find plenty more examples on Youtube.

 

What you buy or don't buy is irrelevant because you don't live here in China. And that's the whole point of why people shouldn't be making judgement from afar about something they haven't personally experienced nor understand.

 

When the majority 90% of China's population - who lives in 2nd , 3rd tier cities, towns or villages - become more mature and civil, then the country is ready for democracy. I would say at least another 10 years for the new generations to grow up.

 

Just like Korea and Taiwan lived under dictatorship and martial law until the time was ripe. You do know about massive violent rioting in Korea for many years, right? Is that acceptable? No. Martial Law was imposed and lifted only when the people became more civil and obedient.

 

The rioting occurred before K-pop, when Korean men were real brutes instead of the now fashionable plastic-surgery effeminate male.


Edited by chino, 05 August 2014 - 1319 PM.

  • 0

#28 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1232 PM

Here's a reason why I support curbs on freedom:

 

 

This is a very graphic youtube video, shot by Korean television, of the immediate aftermath of the 2009 massacre of Han Chinese by Uyghurs. It showed the place littered with dead and mutilated corpses of Han Chinese men, women, possibly children. Very graphic, I couldn't watch it whole as it made me want to go out and kill some Uyghurs.

 

As you know, there is a complete ban on Youtube, while local website content are subject to censorship. Meaning no Chinese saw this video on Youtube, till maybe much later when things subsided.

 

But imagine if there was no press control, no ban, and Han Chinese - say half a billion of them - saw this video on Youtube while the fighting is still ongoing.

 

It will incite a Han Chinese "jihad" on Uyghurs. Han Chinese of the whole country - not just those in Xingjiang - will rise up to exact vengeance on Uyghurs. The whole country would be fighting. Don't believe? Deadly racial altercations between Uyghurs and Han occur even outside of Xinjiang in Guangzhou over matters smaller than a massacre.

 

So this is what I meant by censorship or curtail of freedom, being not just useful, but necessary.

 

You cannot think of just your personal desire for freedom of expression.

The Chinese always say they do not fear any outside threats, because the ones that will do them in will always be the internal strife.


  • 0

#29 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1238 PM

 

On the other side, I think some people are more comfortable with limits and boundaries on the society their reside in. I felt that maybe you were like this and thus feel ok with limited freedoms at least with the way it is in China. So now I know :) And such limited freedoms may offer some things not possible in a free society. I can imagine it. (Just had a minor earthquake tremor)

 

I quit school at 16, growing up, the only time I could be controlled was when I was doing military service, which I loved. So, no, I am not accepting of limited freedoms.

 

But there is always what I want as an individual, versus what is necessary for the greater good.

 

No more earthquake, I hope.


Edited by chino, 05 August 2014 - 1352 PM.

  • 0

#30 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1259 PM

Much of China sees civil strife - protests and riots - and the country is always just a few breaths away from complete chaos. Especially common are labor-related riots.

 

http://www.bbc.com/n...-china-18623085


  • 0

#31 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1331 PM

 

Actually, if you go read the first few pages of that thread, I even included a potential conflict with Japan. I got alot of crap from the unimaginative - "how could a Spratly scenario ever wind up involving Japan??

 

In early 1990's, I wrote a never finished story, where I mentioned the killing of Filipino marines by the PLAN over Spratlys to give some historic backdrop to the era. This killing is fictional and never happened. But it did reveal that even back in the 1990's there were severe tension between the two nations over Spratlys.


  • 0

#32 chino

chino

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,181 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1342 PM

Taiwan is already Chinese. It is the Republic of China. It doesn't have to be part of PRC to be Chinese. However some people in Taiwan want to escape the historical legacy with China and are considering just calling themselves Taiwanese. PRC's reaction is far from friendly though to ROC officially become Taiwan, big reason why they won't.

 

Actually Taiwan itself admits that Taiwan is a part of Mainland China. Don't forget the original plan of the KMT was to recapture power over the Mainland, and after that, they will continue to administer Taiwan as a province o China. The KMT never thought for a second that the island of Taiwan is not a part of the Mainland.

 

That some Taiwanese now decide that the island of Taiwan no longer belongs to China is logically unacceptable and they should be prepared to shed blood for it.

 

Imagine if Bush Jr instead of retiring from the Presidency, sets up government on Manhattan Island, and later declares it independent of the United States. Is that OK so long as the inhabitants of Manhattan Island also wants to be independent and call themselves The Manhattans? Wait...


  • 0

#33 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nonbiri

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,040 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1349 PM

God bliss America for making freedom work, its all I can say. (slightly figuratively)

 

That video was horrific.

 

If they can't integrate the Uyghurs, they should consider cutting Xinjinag off PRC proper and focus improving the Han culture. Any Uyghurs that want to stay in PRC can be welcomed, but if they are troublemakers, boot them off to their new low rate East Turkestan homeland.

 

I know that the KMT's goals was to recapture the mainland. Totally unrealistic now. Its a shame they (younger generations) can't just cut off historical baggage and declare themselves Taiwanese.

 

The idea of the Big apple wanting to be separate from the US? Can't visualize it. Try California :)


  • 0

#34 urbanoid

urbanoid

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,412 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 1425 PM

There's KMT that has one-China policy like the CCP, where both sides think of themselves as true representatives of the Chinese people and the other side as usurpers, but there's also DPP. It's support is growing, just like the number of people who identify themselves as exclusively Taiwanese. The Taiwanese businessmen like doing business with the mainland, but recently we had young people storming government buildings in protest of a trade deal that makes their country more dependent on the mainland. The position with most support is to retain status quo, but only because of fear of military action by Beijing. Just after that there are people who want independence anyway, while those who support reunification are a tiny minority.


  • 0

#35 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,308 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 2121 PM

"We Come In Peace"

 

101407227160.jpg

 

NyackNyack! NyackNyackNyack!


  • 0

#36 Corinthian

Corinthian

    Stone Age Bitter Delusional Retard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,347 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 2320 PM

  Please do not jump to the conclusion that China is next ready to invade the Philippines proper.

 

 

When people here (Philippines) discuss the SCS issues, a lot think that China intends to invade the Philippines. This alarmist note doesn't help things. Fortunately, saner heads prevail in our foreign ministry.

 

 

I would like to see a strong, friendly China, one whose strength can provide security, peace, and economic prosperity to the region. Had China been less "aggressive" in its claims, I would welcome Philippines having a closer relationship with China from economic to military. Alas....


  • 0

#37 Navck

Navck

    Crunchie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 1434 PM

 

 

These videos probably shouldn't be taken very seriously but it definitely requires attention. I wish I could understand the Chinese but my Chinese is still just beginner level.

 

 

Spoke to two native speakers of Mandarian about this. Lets say the first one reads into the ultranationalistic garbage too much and claims that those lines are some kind of coastal blockade designed to Infringe on the Rights of Chinese via Dirty American Racist Xenophobic Imperialism to Oppress the Chinese into Economic Despair and Enslavement. The second person tells me that the map/diagram is just some analyst stuff wherein they talk about the US war strategy for some hypothectical conflict in which the US would attempt to contain China within the red line and if containment cannot be achieved then the fallback would be to the white line. The green line is apparently some hypothectical case in which the war goes towards the Chinese side or things and the US will do anything at any cost to prevent them from getting past that.


  • 0

#38 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nonbiri

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,040 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 0822 AM

 

 

 

These videos probably shouldn't be taken very seriously but it definitely requires attention. I wish I could understand the Chinese but my Chinese is still just beginner level.

 

 

Spoke to two native speakers of Mandarian about this. Lets say the first one reads into the ultranationalistic garbage too much and claims that those lines are some kind of coastal blockade designed to Infringe on the Rights of Chinese via Dirty American Racist Xenophobic Imperialism to Oppress the Chinese into Economic Despair and Enslavement. The second person tells me that the map/diagram is just some analyst stuff wherein they talk about the US war strategy for some hypothectical conflict in which the US would attempt to contain China within the red line and if containment cannot be achieved then the fallback would be to the white line. The green line is apparently some hypothectical case in which the war goes towards the Chinese side or things and the US will do anything at any cost to prevent them from getting past that.

 

 

Ok, interesting, thanks. The lines in the video you quoted here are a little different from the lines in the other videos/maps. Such as the first line here (red) includes the Philippines where as the 1st island chain line in other sources (for lack of a better word) exclude the Philippines. So its the difference  between US blockade lines and PRC defense lines. Well, I'll stop myself here since again, the videos probably shouldn't be taking too seriously.


  • 0

#39 Navck

Navck

    Crunchie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 1036 AM

From my understanding those lines are part of a "Chinese (armchair general) view on American naval strategy." Take it as seriously as you would for AirPowerAustralia at this rate.


  • 0

#40 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,308 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 1651 PM

China will construct a "Chinese Christian theology" suitable for the country, state media reported on Thursday, as both the number of believers and tensions with the authorities are on the rise. China has between 23 million and 40 million Protestants, accounting for 1.7 to 2.9 per cent of the total population, the state-run China Daily said, citing figures given at a seminar in Shanghai.

 

http://www.scmp.com/...ons-church-says


  • 0