Jump to content


Photo

Saab Viggen Vs Draken


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#41 lastdingo

lastdingo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,576 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 17 September 2017 - 1733 PM

Back in the 80's Mirage F.1 were better for interceptor and air policing duties in Spain than the F/A-18 because the latter had a much longer (IIRC 5 min for Mirage, 15 min for Hornet) time for take off preparations. Calibrating the INS was the issue IIRC.


  • 0

#42 sunday

sunday

    Bronze-age right-wing delusional retard

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,189 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Badalona, Spain
  • Interests:Technology, History

Posted 19 September 2017 - 0351 AM

Back in the 80's Mirage F.1 were better for interceptor and air policing duties in Spain than the F/A-18 because the latter had a much longer (IIRC 5 min for Mirage, 15 min for Hornet) time for take off preparations. Calibrating the INS was the issue IIRC.

 

Source, please? Not all Spanish Mirage F1 had INSs in the 1980s.


  • 0

#43 lastdingo

lastdingo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,576 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1201 PM

That's why.


  • 0

#44 bd1

bd1

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,829 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:estonia

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1432 PM

same preparations thing was said in some decade-old AF Monthly about USAF  F-5 agressor squadrons - they had long ago taken off, f-16-s (iirc) were still fumbling with switches


  • 0

#45 sunday

sunday

    Bronze-age right-wing delusional retard

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,189 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Badalona, Spain
  • Interests:Technology, History

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1452 PM

And the source?


Edited by sunday, 19 September 2017 - 1453 PM.

  • 0

#46 shep854

shep854

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,229 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham AL, USA
  • Interests:Military History, Aviation

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1459 PM

Interesting.  'Ready' birds are supposed to be 'cocked'--preflighted and set up so all that is required is engine start and roll.  5 minutes to wheels up, MAX is the US standard.


  • 0

#47 Yama

Yama

    The only honest Scorpion

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,606 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yogo Shiro

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1500 PM

Reportedly BulgarianAF MiG drivers were quite bemused when they were acquinted with NATO alert practises - MiG-21 would roar off the runway in few minutes, whilst F-16 would send a long time calibrating stuff, waiting for gyros etc...
Supposedly it was one reason why Swedish AF rejected F-16, it was not well suited for Swedish road bases, nor alert starts.
  • 0

#48 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,442 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1510 PM

Looks like 7 mins to scramble a Greek F-16 Block 50:

 

https://youtu.be/a6uWFB_qbWE

https://youtu.be/imEAOThGbUI


  • 0

#49 lastdingo

lastdingo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,576 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1757 PM

Reportedly BulgarianAF MiG drivers were quite bemused when they were acquinted with NATO alert practises - MiG-21 would roar off the runway in few minutes, whilst F-16 would send a long time calibrating stuff, waiting for gyros etc...
Supposedly it was one reason why Swedish AF rejected F-16, it was not well suited for Swedish road bases, nor alert starts.

 
Some Warsaw Pact fighter units - including Eastern German ones - practised alerts so much that they were able to take off with an entire wing in 11 minutes (with toleration of maximum taxiing speed limit violations by a factor of two). East German army units were similar - like near-total evacuation of barracks within 10 minutes, including motor vehicles.
NATO appears to not have understood or known this until 1990.

Looks like 7 mins to scramble a Greek F-16 Block 50:

https://youtu.be/a6uWFB_qbWE
https://youtu.be/imEAOThGbUI


Modern INS systems use completely different technologies than 1970's and 1980's INS systems.

Edited by lastdingo, 19 September 2017 - 1759 PM.

  • 0

#50 Yama

Yama

    The only honest Scorpion

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,606 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yogo Shiro

Posted 19 September 2017 - 1830 PM

Even today, NATO 'quick reaction alert' only requires 15min readiness, whereas in old Warsaw pact, and many neutral air forces it meant 5 minutes readiness. However presumably any fighter can take off much quicker if really needed, screw INS and whatnot.
  • 0

#51 MiloMorai

MiloMorai

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,611 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 19 September 2017 - 2205 PM

I did R&O on the CF-5 INS. It took 5 minutes for the gyros to spin up and another 10 minutes before they stabilized. That is when I started recording drift.


  • 0

#52 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,442 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 20 September 2017 - 1316 PM

I am starting to wonder about Dingo's source too. F/A-18A manual sez:

 

 (A) INS - CHECK a. Check waypoint 0 and magnetic variation. • QUAL should be OK within 6 minutes.

 

See here for an interview with a pilot on the alarm shack. For non-Spanish speakers, he says that they need to be in the air in less than 15 mins. from the alarm sounding but they could be brought to cockpit alert (5 mins) or be at the ready at the end of the runway (2 mins)

 

https://youtu.be/UqxVB3rWpYQ


  • 0

#53 wendist

wendist

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 475 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Skåne,Sweden

Posted 07 October 2017 - 1739 PM

This is a bit off topic but since the J 35 carried Falcon missiles I decided to post the link below. I have always been a bit intrigued by the Falcon missiles in Swedish service, the SARH Rb 27 was our only radar homing missile until the Skyflash (Rb 71) became operational with the JA 37 in 1980 and the IR homing RB 28 was kept in service for many years by the Swedish Air Force despite the fact that we already had the AIM-9B (Rb 24) in service since 1959. The report below is, IMHO, a very good read.

 

http://www.ausairpow...-Evolution.html


  • 0




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users