Well, it's sorta-kinda accurate if by "a few years ago" you mean "a few decades ago", and it's debatable if the Greens weren't actually subverted by pedo activists who exploited their naivety surrounding the complex of abolishing the criminalization of homosexuality (and later the general thrust for gay rights/gay emancipation).
Conflating themselves with homosexuals has arguably been the greatest success of the pro-pedophilia movement, even though both are in fact entirely separate sexual orientations. While preference of the same or other sex seems to be roughly 50:50 among them, the defining characteristic of pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescent persons; pedophiles can't function with adults of either sex any better than homosexuals with the respective other sex (though obviously in either case, there are closeted types who can keep up a working appearance and even have families of their own).
It doesn't get any better by many people lumping relations with underage, but sexually mature persons in with pedophilia - you're really doing the activists a favor because you obfuscate pretty clear distinctions. Catholic canon law, to circle back to the topic, actually sets female age of consent to marriage at 14, which happens to co-incide with age of sexual consent plus/minus one year in large parts of the world (in some Mexican states, the Philippines and Angola it's as low as twelve); Islam has no definite marriageable age but makes puberty of both parties a condition, which really cuts to the heart of the matter - sorta "if it bleeds (or squirts), it goes", the basic biological rule.