Jump to content


Photo

Youtube History Thread

Video

  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#21 Andres Vera

Andres Vera

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Becoming a helicopter pilot for the Pinochet administration

Posted 12 September 2017 - 1653 PM

Great topic Andrés. I really liked the animation of Jutland, this has to be one of the most dramatic naval battles of recent times.

That animation got me back to the old days of the "British would have won had they not turned away from the German torpedoes thread". At peak King Sargent Military History traffic we had like two of these a week.


  • 0

#22 BillB

BillB

    Scooter Trash Gunphobic, apparently

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,123 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:English East Midlander in Glasgow, UK
  • Interests:most things military, military modelling, Vespa motor scooters, Staffordshire Bull Terriers

Posted 12 September 2017 - 1902 PM

Well I suppose I'd better bite. At risk of sounding like Rich I gave it the first thirty minutes and found it a sprinkling of accurate facts over lots of simple misrepresentation at best and a mixture of just plain wrong and fantasy at worst...

 

BillB


  • 0

#23 Ken Estes

Ken Estes

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14,300 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle
  • Interests:USMC Tanker, Historian

Posted 13 September 2017 - 0431 AM

Always a problem with breathless efforts to bring the 'real truth ©' to a single video screen, instead of investing many years of research and contemplation to determine 'Wie es eigentlicht gewesen [how it really was - L. Ranke].'


  • 0

#24 Rich

Rich

    intellectual bully ilk

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,113 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:WW II, Current Defense Issues, Military History in General

Posted 13 September 2017 - 1017 AM

 

Well I suppose I'd better bite. At risk of sounding like Rich I gave it the first thirty minutes and found it a sprinkling of accurate facts over lots of simple misrepresentation at best and a mixture of just plain wrong and fantasy at worst...

 

BillB

 

 

Funny, I doubt I have a British accent.


  • 0

#25 BillB

BillB

    Scooter Trash Gunphobic, apparently

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,123 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:English East Midlander in Glasgow, UK
  • Interests:most things military, military modelling, Vespa motor scooters, Staffordshire Bull Terriers

Posted 13 September 2017 - 1128 AM

 

 

Well I suppose I'd better bite. At risk of sounding like Rich I gave it the first thirty minutes and found it a sprinkling of accurate facts over lots of simple misrepresentation at best and a mixture of just plain wrong and fantasy at worst...

 

BillB

 

 

Funny, I doubt I have a British accent.

 

Neither do I, according to some.  :)

 

[edited to add] No insult intended, I was simply referring to your refreshing tendency to deliberately push verifiable facts into the path of a good story. 

 

BillB


  • 0

#26 Andres Vera

Andres Vera

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Becoming a helicopter pilot for the Pinochet administration

Posted 13 September 2017 - 1133 AM


  • 0

#27 nitflegal

nitflegal

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,706 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Armor, martial arts

Posted 13 September 2017 - 1928 PM

 


As someone with more than a passing interest in the katana for the last 30 years and the good fortune to handle a bunch of period versions over the years I found his videos on them pretty poor.  One of the poor things about youtube history videos are there are far too many where someone speaks for 5-20 minutes about a subject he knows little about.  A friend brought a few over and I swung a couple isn't much in the way of research.

My knowledge on swords is very limited. I simply found it refreshing for someone to say that the Katana itself was not a heavenly sword created with ancient Japanese Magics. In truth this alligned with what I learned about the Gladius, it was simply a stabbing tool used by men who knew how to use it to maximum effect, the Roman Legionary. I admit that this is the limit of my knowledge. I am really interested in knowing what you found misleading about the video.

 

Well, everyone knows that the Katana is so totally awesome is can cut a femur in half floating in a stream or some such!  I do appreciate the fact that we are starting to get penetration of the idea that a tachi or katana is simply a curved piece of steel with an edge; a few extremely well made, most Ok to really good, and a decent minority that were crap.  I had a chance to handle some period European swords in the back at the Higgins armory and the steel was just as nice as many high end katana.  This cult of the fancy giant dinner knife is best served dead!  The fact that much of the reason Japanese steel has the mutli-layers and extensive forging is because their ore sucked so badly gets dismissed.  On the scholarly side, I tend to believe the more recent research that says the steel in a good katana was not as good as that in a contemporary European one of similar quality.  If I had to rely on one, modern off the shelf stock is better, stronger, and more pure. . . .

 

As to the video, stating tachi/katana are all roughly the same in design is as silly as discarding Oakshott's typology and saying all European Type Xii's through XVII's are all the same.  There is a tremendous amount of variation in Japanese sword design, even during the Sengoku period.  Not just length, but curvature, weight, width, handle design, handling, etc.  One thing that often gets missed is that most of the swords which survived into the Edo period had to meet gov't regulations, so if you wanted to wear an old sword you had to chop it down to meet official rules.  This leads to many early swords looking like Edo period ones because they'd been heavily mutilated.  Again, it's like handling good European longswords.  The construction is similar in them but the design noticeably varies according to the purpose.  I suspect part of the problem as well as that Katana has come to mean sword (instead of a the more basic "ken") to we Westerners and so we arbitrarily dismiss all the weird and wonderful variations as some other hard to pronounce Japanese name.


  • 0

#28 Rich

Rich

    intellectual bully ilk

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,113 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:WW II, Current Defense Issues, Military History in General

Posted 14 September 2017 - 1122 AM

 

 

 

Well I suppose I'd better bite. At risk of sounding like Rich I gave it the first thirty minutes and found it a sprinkling of accurate facts over lots of simple misrepresentation at best and a mixture of just plain wrong and fantasy at worst...

 

BillB

 

 

Funny, I doubt I have a British accent.

 

Neither do I, according to some.  :)

 

[edited to add] No insult intended, I was simply referring to your refreshing tendency to deliberately push verifiable facts into the path of a good story. 

 

BillB

 

 

No insult was perceived either Bill, I just like to tweak you...


  • 0

#29 Mikel2

Mikel2

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,009 posts

Posted 15 September 2017 - 0416 AM

I love this series on the Great War the BBC made for its 50th anniversary.  Lots of veterans were interviewed and the "lions led by donkeys" narrative hadn't come out in force yet.

 


  • 0

#30 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Of the Veronica Cartwright Ilk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 45,360 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eloiland

Posted 15 September 2017 - 0437 AM

Andrew Marr's History of Modern Britain.  The best overview ive seen of Britains transformation from victorian society into the beginnings of its decline as a world power.

 

There is a follow up of Britain from 1945 till the Present day, but they dont seem to have that up at the moment.


  • 0

#31 JWB

JWB

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,619 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:everything (almost)

Posted 16 September 2017 - 1248 PM

US War Department "propamentary" about the final year of the war. The movie cuts back and forth between Brit and Yank. There is little in the way of info that we don't already know. The interesting parts have to do with the mentality, psychology, and attitudes of the participants at that stage of the war. Early in there is a hilariously cynical bit about how  recruiters enticed young men with various promises and benefits.

 


  • 0

#32 Daan

Daan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,765 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Where both sea and skies are grey.

Posted 16 September 2017 - 1311 PM

 

 

 


As someone with more than a passing interest in the katana for the last 30 years and the good fortune to handle a bunch of period versions over the years I found his videos on them pretty poor.  One of the poor things about youtube history videos are there are far too many where someone speaks for 5-20 minutes about a subject he knows little about.  A friend brought a few over and I swung a couple isn't much in the way of research.

My knowledge on swords is very limited. I simply found it refreshing for someone to say that the Katana itself was not a heavenly sword created with ancient Japanese Magics. In truth this alligned with what I learned about the Gladius, it was simply a stabbing tool used by men who knew how to use it to maximum effect, the Roman Legionary. I admit that this is the limit of my knowledge. I am really interested in knowing what you found misleading about the video.

 

Well, everyone knows that the Katana is so totally awesome is can cut a femur in half floating in a stream or some such!  I do appreciate the fact that we are starting to get penetration of the idea that a tachi or katana is simply a curved piece of steel with an edge; a few extremely well made, most Ok to really good, and a decent minority that were crap.  I had a chance to handle some period European swords in the back at the Higgins armory and the steel was just as nice as many high end katana.  This cult of the fancy giant dinner knife is best served dead!  The fact that much of the reason Japanese steel has the mutli-layers and extensive forging is because their ore sucked so badly gets dismissed.  On the scholarly side, I tend to believe the more recent research that says the steel in a good katana was not as good as that in a contemporary European one of similar quality.  If I had to rely on one, modern off the shelf stock is better, stronger, and more pure. . . .

 

As to the video, stating tachi/katana are all roughly the same in design is as silly as discarding Oakshott's typology and saying all European Type Xii's through XVII's are all the same.  There is a tremendous amount of variation in Japanese sword design, even during the Sengoku period.  Not just length, but curvature, weight, width, handle design, handling, etc.  One thing that often gets missed is that most of the swords which survived into the Edo period had to meet gov't regulations, so if you wanted to wear an old sword you had to chop it down to meet official rules.  This leads to many early swords looking like Edo period ones because they'd been heavily mutilated.  Again, it's like handling good European longswords.  The construction is similar in them but the design noticeably varies according to the purpose.  I suspect part of the problem as well as that Katana has come to mean sword (instead of a the more basic "ken") to we Westerners and so we arbitrarily dismiss all the weird and wonderful variations as some other hard to pronounce Japanese name.

 

A good site on the metallurgy and manufacturing of swords is: https://www.tf.uni-k.../iss/index.html. It is written by a former German professor of materials science of the Uni Kiel.

 

In his section on Japanese swords he writes that the problems with their steel stem not only from the lack of decent ore but are also related to the relative primitive metallurgy employed. The Japanese sword industry never progressed beyond the usage of bloomery iron and steel with its associated handicaps.


Edited by Daan, 16 September 2017 - 1311 PM.

  • 0

#33 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Of the Veronica Cartwright Ilk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 45,360 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eloiland

Posted 19 September 2017 - 0933 AM

US National Archives have some interesting programmes, usually from book signing events. This one is particularly interesting, on US continuity of Government plans in the event of a catastrophe.


  • 0

#34 toysoldier

toysoldier

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Miami is a beatiful city
  • Interests:Sci-fi, history, gameplay

Posted 23 September 2017 - 0129 AM

As someone with more than a passing interest in the katana for the last 30 years and the good fortune to handle a bunch of period versions over the years I found his videos on them pretty poor.  One of the poor things about youtube history videos are there are far too many where someone speaks for 5-20 minutes about a subject he knows little about.  A friend brought a few over and I swung a couple isn't much in the way of research.

My knowledge on swords is very limited. I simply found it refreshing for someone to say that the Katana itself was not a heavenly sword created with ancient Japanese Magics. In truth this alligned with what I learned about the Gladius, it was simply a stabbing tool used by men who knew how to use it to maximum effect, the Roman Legionary. I admit that this is the limit of my knowledge. I am really interested in knowing what you found misleading about the video.
Well, everyone knows that the Katana is so totally awesome is can cut a femur in half floating in a stream or some such!  I do appreciate the fact that we are starting to get penetration of the idea that a tachi or katana is simply a curved piece of steel with an edge; a few extremely well made, most Ok to really good, and a decent minority that were crap.  I had a chance to handle some period European swords in the back at the Higgins armory and the steel was just as nice as many high end katana.  This cult of the fancy giant dinner knife is best served dead!  The fact that much of the reason Japanese steel has the mutli-layers and extensive forging is because their ore sucked so badly gets dismissed.  On the scholarly side, I tend to believe the more recent research that says the steel in a good katana was not as good as that in a contemporary European one of similar quality.  If I had to rely on one, modern off the shelf stock is better, stronger, and more pure. . . .
 
As to the video, stating tachi/katana are all roughly the same in design is as silly as discarding Oakshott's typology and saying all European Type Xii's through XVII's are all the same.  There is a tremendous amount of variation in Japanese sword design, even during the Sengoku period.  Not just length, but curvature, weight, width, handle design, handling, etc.  One thing that often gets missed is that most of the swords which survived into the Edo period had to meet gov't regulations, so if you wanted to wear an old sword you had to chop it down to meet official rules.  This leads to many early swords looking like Edo period ones because they'd been heavily mutilated.  Again, it's like handling good European longswords.  The construction is similar in them but the design noticeably varies according to the purpose.  I suspect part of the problem as well as that Katana has come to mean sword (instead of a the more basic "ken") to we Westerners and so we arbitrarily dismiss all the weird and wonderful variations as some other hard to pronounce Japanese name.
A good site on the metallurgy and manufacturing of swords is: https://www.tf.uni-k.../iss/index.html. It is written by a former German professor of materials science of the Uni Kiel.
 
In his section on Japanese swords he writes that the problems with their steel stem not only from the lack of decent ore but are also related to the relative primitive metallurgy employed. The Japanese sword industry never progressed beyond the usage of bloomery iron and steel with its associated handicaps.

Personally i find myself more and more interested in two overlooked japanese items, the assymetrical yumi bow and the light, modular suits of armor. To me those are greater achievements.
  • 0

#35 Andres Vera

Andres Vera

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Becoming a helicopter pilot for the Pinochet administration

Posted 09 April 2018 - 1335 PM

Thoughts on this one?

 


  • 0

#36 bojan

bojan

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,321 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgrade, Serbia
  • Interests:Obscure tanks and guns.
    Obscure facts about well known tanks and guns.
    Obscure historical facts.

Posted 09 April 2018 - 1617 PM

Fact that German generals somewhat "altered" narrative was well known since forever among historians.


  • 0

#37 Andres Vera

Andres Vera

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Becoming a helicopter pilot for the Pinochet administration

Posted 09 April 2018 - 1637 PM

Agreed. What about Manstein, was he lying and threw Paulus under the bus? 


  • 0

#38 Paul Lakowski

Paul Lakowski

    Man of the worldly means

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,732 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Armor Tech and silly humor.

Posted 11 April 2018 - 1911 PM

People who 'debunk history' should be forced to clean up the mess they make. This is no way to right history -even revisionist history.

 

From what I've read ALL generals in ALL wars are forced into political decisions that have regrettable consequences . The politics of who gets thrown under the bus is the inevitable consequence of this process.

 

In most armies/wars the ultimate authority and responsibility rests with the CINC. Correct me if I'm wrong but that was HITLER him self. Normally this CINC is held responsible for all failures and usually has to take the 'hit for the team'. So now instead of throwing Von Paulus under the bus we have to through Manstein under the bus....like a revolving door until run out of people to blame.

 

I got an idea, why don't we through Hitler under the bus for being the biggest war-gamer to actually screw up a war.


  • 0

#39 Andres Vera

Andres Vera

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Becoming a helicopter pilot for the Pinochet administration

Posted 11 April 2018 - 1935 PM

In the end it was all Hitler's fault not his Generals and while this is true there are internal politics and rivalries in all militaries for popularity and power. Losing side Generals always come down to these arguments, I find them interesting. I am not absolving Hitler, just focusing on a different command level and its consequences. Guderian and Keitel. Longstreet, Ewell and Lee. Ney and Soult. 

 

I don't agree with this video, it almost fully absolved Paulus for the destruction of his own Army, and while he was not the Fuhrer, he was the commander and fault in the end goes down with him. He could have saved his Army, even if it costed him his life to the SS. All things considered he should have disobeyed orders and risked it, I am sure the results of this would had been better than the gulag and his men freezing to death.  

 

This new fad of young people vlogging about history is fascinating to me, especially the traffic they have. Manic was right to take it down this road. Going to lectures and conferences is becoming rare in every field and yet it surprised me to see that history would go down that path. 


  • 0

#40 Adam_S

Adam_S

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,018 posts

Posted 12 April 2018 - 1641 PM

Thoughts on this one?

 

 

I haven't seen this particular one but I've watched some of his other videos and the guy is obsessed with oil, or more importantly Germany's lack thereof. He's got some good stuff on his channel but IMO he can be a bit blinkered about other factors.


  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Video

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users