Jump to content


Photo

Australian Reconnaissance Vehicle Replacement Competitors.


  • Please log in to reply
210 replies to this topic

#201 2805662

2805662

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1113 AM

http://www.australia...state-bickering

Some additional information on the infrastructure/industry portions of the project. Project cost includes facilities upgrades in Townsville, Brisbane, Pucka, and Adelaide. Costs also include construction of a factory in Brisbane. First 30-odd vehicles built in Germany, the rest built in Australia.
  • 0

#202 GARGEAN

GARGEAN

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,492 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1144 AM

(tons = imperial, tonnes = metric)


Thanks for that, will take on note.
  • 0

#203 Panzermann

Panzermann

    REFORGER '79

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Teutonistan

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1156 AM

 

(tons = imperial, tonnes = metric)


Thanks for that, will take on note.

 

 

to further needlessly complicate things there are imperial short tons and long tons.

 

https://en.wikipedia..._of_mass/weight

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonne

 

 

and other related wikipedia entries go into the details. Makes your head spin. that is probabaly the reason that ton (1000 kilograms) is not an SI unit. But Megagrams is awkward, although correct.


  • 0

#204 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369/-84.2675
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1410 PM

 

to further needlessly complicate things there are imperial short tons and long tons.

 

Long ton being 2240, aka 20 Hundredweight (aka cwt or 112 lbs). British/Commonwealth WWII lorries being rated in hundred weight or if larger types, long tons. aka 15cwt truck being 1680lb capacity. A bit higher than a dodge 3/4 ton truck. 


Edited by rmgill, 17 March 2018 - 1411 PM.

  • 0

#205 shep854

shep854

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,564 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham AL, USA
  • Interests:Military History, Aviation

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1512 PM

Any idea on how far out practical individual wheel motors are?  Eliminating power shafts should help reduce height, though width might be the new critical dimension.


  • 0

#206 2805662

2805662

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1631 PM

Any idea on how far out practical individual wheel motors are?  Eliminating power shafts should help reduce height, though width might be the new critical dimension.


I think hub motors were demonstrated to the US Army in the early 2000s as part of the Thunderbolt version of the M8 AGS.
  • 0

#207 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369/-84.2675
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted 17 March 2018 - 1845 PM

Any idea on how far out practical individual wheel motors are?  Eliminating power shafts should help reduce height, though width might be the new critical dimension.

I just got a mental image of Vehicle crews being taught that in an emergency, pulling the breaker module and licking the contacts was an approved way to get the thing to function in an emergency. 


  • 0

#208 2805662

2805662

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2018 - 2317 PM

 
that is probabaly the reason that ton (1000 kilograms) is not an SI unit. But Megagrams is awkward, although correct.


Did not know that tonne/1,000kg wasnt SI. Cheers!
  • 0

#209 Jeff

Jeff

    Drum beating laughing boy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,443 posts

Posted 18 March 2018 - 1317 PM

 

wow....Malaysian projects arent anywhere that bloated.

The whole thing is a pork barrel / smoke and mirrors project.

 

Considering that 99% of the article was spent extolling the economic benefits of the contract, I tend to agree.


  • 0

#210 2805662

2805662

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2018 - 0257 AM


 


wow....Malaysian projects arent anywhere that bloated.

The whole thing is a pork barrel / smoke and mirrors project.
 
Considering that 99% of the article was spent extolling the economic benefits of the contract, I tend to agree.

$AUD2 Bn on infrastructure & factories. The rest on the vehicles.

The Defence Capability Plan was replaced by ts Integrated Investment Plan (IIP) which intrinsically linked major projects with industrial benefits (so-called Australian Industry Capability/Content) as a means of protecting major projects from cuts while delivering the requisite level of capability. Without that local anchor, major projects were at risk of cancellation (see the Land 17 SPH, for example). Companies now participate in the global supply chains of winning primes (JSF & Boxer, for example). Provided as background.
  • 0

#211 2805662

2805662

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2018 - 1255 PM

Thanks to Defence Technology Review, we have some more information on the numbers of Boxers being purchased.

Original requirement: 225 vehicles, 180 turreted.
Approved numbers: 211 vehicles, 223 mission modules (133 turreted).

Seems as though the modularity of Boxer will exploited.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users