Jump to content


Photo

Digital Combat Simulator


  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

#21 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 26 May 2019 - 0743 AM

This was good too.


  • 0

#22 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 27 May 2019 - 1020 AM


  • 0

#23 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 04 June 2019 - 0235 AM

This is a particular favorite of mine.

 


  • 0

#24 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,583 posts

Posted 04 June 2019 - 1219 PM

Awesome, this Jester is more sinister than Michael Ironside himself


  • 0

#25 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 04 June 2019 - 1241 PM

Its pretty good isnt it? :D


  • 0

#26 Chris Werb

Chris Werb

    In Zod We Trust

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10,937 posts

Posted 10 June 2019 - 1618 PM

 

The damage inflicted isn't very realistic.


  • 0

#27 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 11 June 2019 - 0234 AM

They still have the damage modelling they brought out over 10 years ago with the 'Lock On' series. They are presently doing an upgrade to all the game objects to have realistic hitboxs not a million miles away from how Steel Beasts do it.

This is how they intend to impliment it. Ive not read they specifically intend to add it to land vehicles, but that is my impression. They are already trying to try and do more with ground vehicles, but till they get the damage modelling sorted out, there are clear limitations.

p-51_x-ray.jpg

Fw190D9-x-ray.jpg


  • 0

#28 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 28 July 2019 - 0537 AM

 


  • 0

#29 Mr King

Mr King

    Fat Body

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,418 posts

Posted 31 July 2019 - 0223 AM

Wow that looks amazing.


  • 0

#30 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 31 July 2019 - 0231 AM

Yes it does.

 

Ill be honest I dont think electronic jets are really my thing. Ive fallen in love with the F14 in the game, and I also like the Mig29's pitch authority. Fly By Wire gets in the way of doing stupid stuff that might save your life. But Ill probably get it anyway, partly because its iconic, partly because you can use the damn thing in nearly every theatre. That and I grew up playing the Falcon series. :D

 

The only thing I dont like is that they arent going to model the JSOW, although as I believe they are on the F18 they sell, so its difficult to be upset by that.

 

In other news, a modding team is building a free Mig25RBT. Nice Tomcat fodder. :)

https://forums.eagle...ad.php?t=244919


Edited by Stuart Galbraith, 31 July 2019 - 0232 AM.

  • 0

#31 Daan

Daan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,121 posts

Posted 31 July 2019 - 0342 AM

The JSOW is already available on the F/A-18C right now in DCS. Apparently the F-16C variant ED is developing did not have JSOW, which came later, and it was removed as a loadout option.

 

If you like the more primitive planes, try the MiG-21bis. It was originally made by Leatherneck (later Heatblur), which also did the Viggen and Tomcat, so the MiG has a nice if quirky flight model, engine flame outs and it rattles like an old car doing certain maneuvers. Landings should be conducted according to exact parameters at high speed or you will stall, crash or break the landing gear. If you managed to waste all your pressurized air during fight, you will not be able to deploy your landing gear nor your brake parachute. The simple cockpit is in the gloriously awful Soviet style with an often rather bizarre placement of the flight instruments. When compared to the nicely laid out cockpit of its contemporary, the F-5E, you really wonder what the Soviet designers were thinking. However, the MiG-21bis does have a functional autopilot and a more extensive navigation system, allowing for the interesting RSBN block approach to the airfield in poor visibility.  

 

The current developer, Magnitude LLC, is busy revamping the cockpit, but this means some features are bugged right now. Most conspicuous of which are the flood lights. The default campaign is of poor quality and broken as well. I downloaded a user made update to the campaign, but it is still not enjoyable. Like in the original version, most missions start at night or dawn and the cockpit flood lights are missed dearly. While instrument flying does have its attractions, it is impossible to spot the opposing aircraft in the pitch black of night. Yesterday, I turned the labels on and spent some time chasing red chevrons on an otherwise black screen all the while trying to avoid crashing into a mountain :glare:.

 

Though the single player campaign experience is rather poor, there are two Cold War multiplayer servers in which the MiG-21bis is able to shine. You can bind a key to immediately request a bogey dope call from the AWACS to help you find the opponent.

 

------------

 

With respect to mods, a new trainer recently came available, the MB-339A: http://www.freccetri...rivirtuali.net/, https://forums.eagle...ad.php?t=244476

 

It looks nice, but I am not too interested in flying trainers and doing aerobatics.

 

Regarding the MiG-25 mod, why on earth did they decide for a recce variant? It has no use in the DCS universe.  :(  I would pay $70,- for a MiG-25P or PD model. DCS really lacks high fidelity red aircraft of the later Cold War era.


Edited by Daan, 31 July 2019 - 0359 AM.

  • 0

#32 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 31 July 2019 - 0357 AM

Yeah, I have the mig21. Ive not played it for a while, for which there is no good reason because I agree, its excellent. I find that and the Spitfire my favourite rides in DCS. The latter is a complete bitch on takeoff and landing, just like the original.

 

Re Mods, there is also someone working on a T45, which will be a nice filler for the now defunct hawk.

 

Have you tried the Dogfight server? I have a ton of fun on that with the F14. Its still a handful but im slowly getting the hand of it. Incidentally there is a really great video here on how to get the best out the F14, which ive found really interesting.

 


  • 0

#33 Mr King

Mr King

    Fat Body

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,418 posts

Posted 31 July 2019 - 1817 PM

If someone doesn't make an Iron Eagle montage when the F-16 DLC comes out, I am going to be sorely disappointed. 

 


  • 0

#34 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 01 August 2019 - 0204 AM

You can play a walkman on the F14 and the Viggen. I put the Top Gun album on mine. Surprising it actually seems to improve my BFM. I kinda.... calm down. :)


  • 0

#35 Mr King

Mr King

    Fat Body

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,418 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 1118 AM

Stuart forgive me if I have asked this before, but what is your flight sim controller set up like? 


  • 0

#36 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 1350 PM

I did have a saitek X56, which was ok but the build quality was so lousy the switches stopped working. In the end I plumped for a Thrustmaster Warthog and throttle, which are pretty excellent. Ive got some saitek pedals, which are fairly cheap and pretty necessary for the F14, and I got a Occulus rift vr goggles.

 

Well I dont spend lots of money out partying each weekend, so Its my present to me for being a dull boy. :D


  • 0

#37 Daan

Daan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,121 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 1634 PM

I second the comment on the Warthog stick and throttle, but I only paid € 100,- for a second hand set that had hardly been used. My pedals are new 'VKB T-rudder pedals mk IV', which I advise to stay away from due to the recurring software errors (and resulting spontaneous rudder inputs) in the so-called orange box of the system, even with updated firmware. For head movements I have a used Track IR 5 system for which I paid € 120-130 IIRC.


  • 0

#38 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 03 August 2019 - 0612 AM

Thats disappointing about the pedals, VKB have a pretty good reputation for sticks from what I read online.

 

I may at length get the Thrustmaster pedals, but they cost an arm and leg, and Ive doubts whether they would fit under my desk. :D

 

I might get the F18 stick to go on the warthog base. I want to get back into flying the Harrier again, and its near identical to the one the Harrier uses.


  • 0

#39 Daan

Daan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,121 posts

Posted 03 August 2019 - 0637 AM

 I won't get the F/A-18 stick for the Warthog base, as it does not have the nice platform of the A-10C/F-16C stick to rest my hand on. Of course, this is no problem when the stick is not standing on a desk.


  • 0

#40 Stuart Galbraith

Stuart Galbraith

    Just Another Salisbury Tourist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,655 posts

Posted 03 August 2019 - 0651 AM

Yeah, thats true. I use mine on a desk too.

 

If I clear out the shed, I might be able to build a half decent Tomcat cockpit, but there doesnt seem much point if you are playing in vr. :D


  • 0