Jump to content


Photo

Meanwhile, In Yemen


  • Please log in to reply
571 replies to this topic

#1 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nemui

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 9,859 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:doko da?!
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 22 January 2015 - 1939 PM

President resigns due to pressures with Shiite rebels that control the capital.

http://www.japantime...s/#.VMGW13gay0c
  • 0

#2 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,951 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369/-84.2675
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted 22 January 2015 - 2032 PM

I'm sorry, I thought that during the SOTU that the president said things were working out well in Yemen....Was he talking about a different Yemen?  :huh:


  • 0

#3 JasonJ

JasonJ

    nemui

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 9,859 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:doko da?!
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 22 January 2015 - 2300 PM

I'm sorry, I thought that during the SOTU that the president said things were working out well in Yemen....Was he talking about a different Yemen?  :huh:


But..

The page has turned!

So everysing is turned to da better in ME!
  • 0

#4 Colin

Colin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,628 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:tanks, old and new AFV's, Landrovers, diving, hovercrafts

Posted 23 January 2015 - 0055 AM

CNN Wwas labelling this an AQ op but I don't think they were part of this
  • 0

#5 BansheeOne

BansheeOne

    Bullshit filter overload, venting into civility charger

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,709 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Berlin

Posted 23 January 2015 - 0129 AM

Particulary as AQ would habe no truck with Shi'ites supported by Iran.
  • 0

#6 urbanoid

urbanoid

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,283 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lodz, Poland

Posted 11 February 2015 - 1603 PM

What a disgrace...

 

 

Official: Houthis seize U.S. Embassy vehicles, Marines' weapons at airport

Sanaa, Yemen (CNN)Houthi rebels took all U.S. Embassy vehicles parked at the Yemeni capital's airport and wouldn't let departing U.S. Marines take their weapons with them, a top Sanaa airport official said about the latest evidence of unrest in an Arab nation long seen as key in America's fight against terrorists.

The actions come after the United States, along with Britain, suspended operations at their embassies and moved out staffers because of the instability in Yemen.

According to the official, the Houthis seized many U.S. Marines' weapons at the airport, and the American troops also handed over some to random airport officials Wednesday.

The previous night, embassy officials burned tens of thousands of documents and destroyed weapons that were inside the Sanaa embassy's storage warehouses, Yemeni employees of the embassy said.

http://edition.cnn.c...rest/index.html


  • 0

#7 Mr King

Mr King

    Fat Body

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,569 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Muppetville

Posted 11 February 2015 - 1830 PM


  • 0

#8 Colin

Colin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,628 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:tanks, old and new AFV's, Landrovers, diving, hovercrafts

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0039 AM

Well he is correct, a success for the Shiites


  • 0

#9 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,181 posts
  • Interests:tanks. More tanks. Guns. BIG GUNs!

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0056 AM

Run away! Why should Iran negotiate with a loser?


  • 0

#10 beans4

beans4

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 376 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0746 AM

Hope the Yemeni's get as much enjoyment out of the pool as the Lybians did.


  • 0

#11 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,181 posts
  • Interests:tanks. More tanks. Guns. BIG GUNs!

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0806 AM

Oh..it's going to suck azz...and KSA is even more shitting bricks.


  • 0

#12 urbanoid

urbanoid

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,283 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lodz, Poland

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0828 AM

The question is why hasn't anything been done? Part of the Yemeni military remained loyal to the government and were fighting the advancing Houthis, wouldn't air support by US and maybe KSA change the situation on the ground? Having Iranian proxy ruling the country is not the best idea.


  • 0

#13 shep854

shep854

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,932 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham AL, USA
  • Interests:Military History, Aviation

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0957 AM

At least the Marines were allowed to maintain a shred of dignity:


Marines Destroyed All Weapons in Yemen Evacuation

http://www.military....html?ESRC=eb.nl

"The Marine Security Force left the American embassy in Yemen for the movement to the airfield as part of the 'ordered departure' with only personal weapons. All crew-served weapons were destroyed at the Embassy prior to movement. None of them were 'handed over' in any way to anyone," the Marine Corps said.

 

' "Upon arrival at the airfield, all personal weapons were rendered inoperable in accordance with advance planning," the statement said. "Specifically, each bolt was removed from its weapons body and rendered inoperable by smashing with sledgehammers. The weapons' bodies, minus the bolts, were then separately smashed with sledgehammers." '


  • 0

#14 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,181 posts
  • Interests:tanks. More tanks. Guns. BIG GUNs!

Posted 12 February 2015 - 0957 AM

Because Obama.

Salad eating surrender.........


Edited by Simon Tan, 12 February 2015 - 0958 AM.

  • 0

#15 Paul G.

Paul G.

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 7,961 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 February 2015 - 1500 PM

Posted this in FFZ post before seing this topic.

 

How we lost Yemen. The United States used the Pakistan playbook on Yemen's terrorists. It didn't work.

http://foreignpolicy...-we-lost-yemen/

 

 

The answer is simple, if rather disheartening: Faulty assumptions and a mistaken focus paired with a resilient, adaptive enemy have created a serious problem for the United States.

 

In Afghanistan and Pakistan, al Qaeda was largely a group of Arabs in non-Arab countries. In Yemen, al Qaeda is made up mostly of Yemenis living in Yemen.

 

The United States can target and kill someone as a terrorist, only to have Yemenis take up arms to defend him as a tribesman. In time, many of these men are drawn to al Qaeda not out of any shared sense of ideology, but rather out of a desire to get revenge on the country that killed their fellow tribesman.

 

Further compounding the problem is the U.S. insistence on focusing on personalities instead of the broader network. This is what CIA officials refer to as "mowing the lawn" of terrorism, but it comes at the expense of not attacking the root system.

 

 

CT operations primarily based on drone strikes is a balance of risk. Very little risk incurred to US Forces, a great deal of risk of collateral damage.

 

For years, the elite Joint Special Operations Command and the CIA had teams deployed inside Yemen that supported Yemeni forces and conducted unilateral operations, consisting mostly of cruise missile and drone attacks. Some of the unilateral strikes have killed their intended targets, such as the CIA attack on Awlaki. But others have killed civilians—at times, a lot of civilians. And many of these have been in Abyan and its neighboring province of Shebwa, both of which have recently seen a substantial rise of AQAP activity. President Obama’s first known authorization of a missile strike on Yemen, on December 17, 2009, killed more than forty Bedouins, many of them women and children, in the remote village of al Majala in Abyan. Another US strike, in May 2010, killed an important tribal leader and the deputy governor of Marib province, Jabir Shabwani, sparking mass anger at the United States and Saleh’s government. “I think these airstrikes were based on false intelligence from the regime, because that is the nature of the contractor,” Qahtan charges. “The contractor wants to create more work in return for earning more money.”

 

The October drone strike that killed Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, a US citizen, and his teenage cousin shocked and enraged Yemenis of all political stripes. “I firmly believe that the [military] operations implemented by the US performed a great service for Al Qaeda, because those operations gave Al Qaeda unprecedented local sympathy,” says Jamal, the Yemeni journalist. The strikes “have recruited thousands.” Yemeni tribesmen, he says, share one common goal with Al Qaeda, “which is revenge against the Americans, because those who were killed are the sons of the tribesmen, and the tribesmen never, ever give up on revenge.” Even senior officials of the Saleh regime recognize the damage the strikes have caused. “People certainly resent these [US] interventions,” Qirbi, the foreign minister and a close Saleh ally, concedes.

 

This are classic CT vs COIN lessons learned and relearned in Vietnam, Northern Ireland, Afghanistan, Iraq...


  • 0

#16 Mr King

Mr King

    Fat Body

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,569 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Muppetville

Posted 12 February 2015 - 1714 PM

A.K.A. Obama Drone Doctrine 


  • 0

#17 Simon Tan

Simon Tan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,181 posts
  • Interests:tanks. More tanks. Guns. BIG GUNs!

Posted 13 February 2015 - 0021 AM

It shows the utter lack of ability to analyze and understand both the strategic situation and threat. Everything is idealogically driven. I can only hope the next admin does a xi jinping style house clearing.
  • 0

#18 Paul G.

Paul G.

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 7,961 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 13 February 2015 - 1026 AM

It shows the utter lack of ability to analyze and understand both the strategic situation and threat. Everything is idealogically driven. I can only hope the next admin does a xi jinping style house clearing.

 

Either that or the decision to take the politically expedient Course of action dispite the strategic situation and threat.


  • 0

#19 Colin

Colin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,628 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:tanks, old and new AFV's, Landrovers, diving, hovercrafts

Posted 13 February 2015 - 1218 PM

Drones appeal to US politicians as it means jobs at home and minimal losses of people overseas. People also fail to consider the US landscape when they speak of COIN.


  • 0

#20 Paul G.

Paul G.

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 7,961 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 13 February 2015 - 1221 PM

I think the lesson should be that drones are an interesting battlfield multiplier, but should only be used on a population that we are at war with, not one we would like to have on our side, or at least remain neutral. The costs outweigh the benifits.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users