Jump to content


Photo

Alhuthali And Low On Sic/vinylester Nanocomposite Fracture

sic silicon carbide vinylester vinyl ester polymer ceramic composite materials armor armour nanocomposite

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 TTK Ciar

TTK Ciar

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,992 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sebastopol, CA, USA
  • Interests:material engineering, composite armor, GPC, battletank technology

Posted 08 August 2015 - 1925 PM

I ran across this curious gem today:

http://ciar.org/ttk/...huthali_low.pdf

In it, Alhuthali and Low examine the influence of SiC nanoparticles on vinylester's fracture mechanics.

Of particular interest was the discovery of a "sweet spot" in the ratio of vinylester to SiC for maximum strength vs toughness, being somewhere near 5% SiC but definitely higher than 3% and lower than 10%.

Also, on pp11-12 it is mentioned that larger SiC granules offer a toughening effect by mitigating crack propagation (like ripstop).

Thinking back to previous discussions of ballistic properties of composites of vinylester and large-diameter ceramic granules in closer to 50%/50% proportion, it occurs to me that one might combine the strengthening effect of the nanoparticles with the antiballistic and toughening effects of large-diameter granules.

A mixture of 57% vinylester, 3% SiC nanoparticles, and 40% SiC granules would put the fraction of nanoparticles in the vinylester between granules at 5% (57 + 3 = 60, 3 / 60 = 0.05), for an overall cured density of 2.0 g/cc.

Does this seem reasonable? The main problem I foresee is mixing the granules with the composite without accumulating piles of microparticles in front of them, which Alhuthali and Low point out creates focus points for mechanical stress (what they call "agglomerations" on p10).

Edited by TTK Ciar, 08 August 2015 - 1928 PM.

  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: sic, silicon carbide, vinylester, vinyl ester, polymer ceramic composite, materials, armor, armour, nanocomposite

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users