Jump to content


Photo

Hypothetical War : Contest For The Spratleys


  • Please log in to reply
1238 replies to this topic

#1 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 June 2011 - 1558 PM

The United States is decisively engaged in the aftermath of the National Elections and the fallout from 21 December 2012. The PRC makes stops apologizing and starts seriously flexing their muscles, forcing Vietnam, Japan and the Philippines to become reluctant allies.

The Vietnamese have lost the combat experience edge they held during the Sino-Vietnamese War.

What happens next?

Based on this -

Singapore (CNN) -- U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Saturday warned that clashes could occur in the South China Sea if nations in the area do not agree on ways to deal with disputes.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/06/04/china.gates.visit/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

and this

General Liang Guanglie, China’s defence minister, has rejected criticism that his country was acting belligerently in the South China Sea, saying China was pursuing a “peaceful rise”.

“You say our actions do not match our words. I certainly do not agree,” Gen Liang replied to critics at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a high-profile Asia defence forum in Singapore.

Speaking days after Vietnam and the Philippines accused China of aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea, Gen Liang denied that China was threatening security in the strategically important and energy-rich disputed waters, saying “freedom of navigation has never been impeded”.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/21c9e72a-8f9b-11e0-954d-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1OSKXqKLX

See also
http://208.84.116.22...showtopic=29064

and
http://208.84.116.22...ic=26678&st=120

#2 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0400 AM

Japan? what does Japan has to do with the Spratlys?

They are claimed by the PRC, Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam. Just getting there is hard, and no island is substantial enough to support a proper military base.

Air assets are going to be tight getting there:

Malaysia: 18 Su-30MKM, 8 F/A-18D
Brunei: no combat aircraft
Phillippines: I defer to those with more knowledge, but seems to have just some OV-10s and S.211s
Taiwan: well armed but has no aircraft that can reach there
Vietnam: 6x Su-27SK, 5x Su-27UBK, 4x Su-30MK2V

So air cover for the coalition is going to be thin in the best of cases.

At Hainan the PLAN has 1 regiment each with J-8, J-11 (the local Su-27 derivative) and JH-7, with a PLAAf regiment in the continent equipped with Su-27. if you add ex-Varyag to the mix, they are not going to have a lot of trouble achieving air supremacy to just take over the islands.



#3 Ken Estes

Ken Estes

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13,999 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle
  • Interests:USMC Tanker, Historian

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0425 AM

Aha! Those Chinese fiends! We now can understand their game. They will run their ex-USSR CV ashore in the Spratleys, an unsinkable aircraft carrier strategy, just as the IJN had for the Marianas!

#4 Guest_JamesG123_*

Guest_JamesG123_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0719 AM

The Chinese will just buy out the other involved parties by writing them big checks, either directly or via aide or trade deals.

The United States is decisively engaged in the aftermath of the National Elections and the fallout from 21 December 2012.


Uh... whut? :blink:

Damn' those 'shroom flashbacks are bitch aren't they?

#5 TonyE

TonyE

    I/Kitsap Militia

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 4,956 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Interests:Them grate steal beest! and, there history.

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0900 AM

Phillippines: I defer to those with more knowledge, but seems to have just some OV-10s and S.211s


They also have that mighty denizen of the sea, BRP Rajah Humabon, the current flagship and leadvessel of the philippine battleline. :excl:

#6 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,819 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369°/-84.2675°
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0949 AM

So, who's going to post the custom harpoon scenario?

#7 BP

BP

    Kulak

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Charleston, SC, USA
  • Interests:Tanks. No shit.

Posted 07 June 2011 - 0955 AM

The Chinese will just buy out the other involved parties by writing them big checks, either directly or via aide or trade deals.


'Zactly! We're the only ones who look for the military option first.

Here's a hypothetical: we stay out of it!

#8 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1015 AM

So, who's going to post the custom harpoon scenario?


Remember why I told you the tag line was applicable? I suppose there were 'experts' mocking Plan Orange, too.

Greater China
Apr 20, 2006

SPEAKING FREELY
If it comes to a shooting war ...
By Victor N Corpus

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

One could call this article a worst-case scenario for the new American century. Why worst case? Because of the hard lessons from history. The Romans did not consider the worst-case scenario when Hannibal crossed the Alps with his elephants and routed them; or when Hannibal encircled and annihilated the numerically superior Roman army at the Battle of Cannae.

The French did not consider the worst-case scenario at Dien Bien Phu and when they built the Maginot Line, and the French suffered disastrous defeats. The Americans did not consider the worst-case scenario at Pearl Harbor or on September 11, and the results were disastrous for the American people. Again, American planners did not consider the worst-case scenario in its latest war in Iraq, but instead operated on the "best-case scenario", such as considering the Iraq invasion a "cake walk" and that the Iraqi people would be parading in the streets, throwing flowers and welcoming American soldiers as "liberators", only to discover the opposite.

http://www.atimes.co...a/HD20Ad03.html

ICE Case Studies
Case Number: 21
Case Mnemonic: Sprat
Case Name: Spratly Islands Dispute
Draft Author: May, 1997
http://www1.american...ice/spratly.htm


And starting on Page 49
http://books.google....spratly&f=false


The Chinese will just buy out the other involved parties by writing them big checks, either directly or via aide or trade deals.
Damn' those 'shroom flashbacks are bitch aren't they?


It's an allegory for the Chinese waiting until the United States is distracted by other global events, since the Chinese are loath to go head-to-head with a stronger enemy.

Edited by X-Files, 07 June 2011 - 1018 AM.


#9 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1024 AM

Japan? what does Japan has to do with the Spratlys?


You want a nice clean scenario? Really? :huh:

That's just a curve ball, Japan being sucked in during the same wave of Chinese assertiveness.


China and Japan hold talks on maritime fuel reserves
In Beijing, Chinese and Japanese diplomats are holding exploratory talks on oil and gas reserves in the East China Sea. Both countries have claimed the area concerned since the Second World War in what is one of their many disputes.

Chinese and Japanese exploration carried out over the past few years has heightened tensions around the fuel reserves issue. The Beijing talks are exploring the possibility of joint Sino-Japanese oil and gas exploitation in the East China Sea. After the United States, China and Japan are the world's second and third biggest energy consumers respectively.

Below is a recent article from Pravda followed by an analysis of the dispute on the Senkaku / Diaoyutai Islands

http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/sino_japgas.html

The dispute between China and Japan over the detention of a Chinese fishing boat captain by Tokyo has brought diplomatic relations between the Asian powers to their lowest level in years.
http://www.voanews.c...-103830609.html

Friction between Asia's established economic power — Japan — and increasingly competitive China forces U.S. officials to rethink a long-term strategy in the region.
http://www.npr.org/t...storyId=5175356

http://www.dailymoti...e-tensions_news

#10 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1029 AM

Phillippines: I defer to those with more knowledge, but seems to have just some OV-10s and S.211s


The Captain of the BRP PF-11, having been served real coffee instead of his usual de-caf, gets trigger happy with the PLAN and his ship becomes the conflict's (first?) unintentional sacrificial lamb.
http://en.wikipedia....Humabon_(PF-11)

#11 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1050 AM

You want a nice clean scenario? Really? Posted Image

That's just a curve ball, Japan being sucked in during the same wave of Chinese assertiveness.


Well, that's a problem, if Japan is in the party, then so it's South Korea and DearLeaderLand, so we are talking about a wider Asian war, and it's inevitable that the US are sucked in.

Ok, so let's rethink all this the US is devastated by a Democrat Landslide (that was the Dec 2012 disaster, wasn't it? Posted Image ), it needs to be so huge that the USN is wiped off the Pacific, "Battle: L.A." short, as it needs to wipe out not only the carriers, but also the submarines and Okinawa... Posted Image

But we go back to point one, nevertheless; even with Japan in (say they deploy F-15Js to the Phillippines) there must be some way to guarantee air cover over the Spratlys, and Japan only has 4 KC-767J tankers so it's not like they will be in a position to have a constant CAP. This leaves whatever is sent to recover the islets exposed to air attack or missile attack.

Submarines are not likely to be much of a factor since the place is full of shallows.

What happens if the PRC says "withdraw or face a nuclear attack?"

#12 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1054 AM



Ok, so let's rethink all this the US is devastated by a Democrat Landslide (that was the Dec 2012 disaster, wasn't it? Posted Image ), it needs to be so huge that the USN is wiped off the Pacific, "Battle: L.A." short, as it needs to wipe out not only the carriers, but also the submarines and Okinawa... Posted Image


Ok, I'll see your crockery with mockery - let's just say a 50' tall James Carville eats Toledo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcxpbhM0DaA



Did you read the linked scenario in the Chinese Aircraft carrier thread, for checkmating the USN?


I'll make it sooperdooper easy for ya. ;)
http://208.84.116.22...ndpost&p=863198

*

More fodder - this is from (...2011 minus 1998 is...) 13 years ago!

China's policy towards the conflict in the last decade has been both promising
and disappointing for the possibility of reaching a solution. On the one hand, the PRC
has repeatedly signalled that she wants to co-operate with the other claimants involved
in the dispute.5 On the other hand, China has continued to push forward its military
position.6 Hence, as argued by Valencia (1995: 14), in the last decade there has been a
marked distance between China's words and deeds in the South China Sea.
The PRC's hegemonic ambitions coupled with its persistent, non-compromising
stance in the Spratly dispute has caused a growing concern in other Southeast Asian
countries in recent years. In a series of interviews carried out by Stein Tønnesson and
myself in Southeast Asia in early 1998 diplomats, researchers and naval officials all
expressed their concerns about China's regional ambitions. However, the persons
interviewed had divergent interpretations of the driving forces behind China's policy.
Some argued that China is pursuing an anachronistic naval realpolitik and that the PRC
intends take control over the entire South China Sea by military means. Others
believed that China is determined to seek a peaceful solution to the conflict.


http://www.prio.no/u...at/Oppgaven.pdf

Edited by X-Files, 07 June 2011 - 1103 AM.


#13 Guest_JamesG123_*

Guest_JamesG123_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1059 AM

By Victor N Corpus


"Victor Corpus" is a dumbass.


One could call this article a worst-case scenario for the new American century. Why worst case? Because of the hard lessons from history. The Romans did not consider the worst-case scenario when Hannibal crossed the Alps with his elephants and routed them; or when Hannibal encircled and annihilated the numerically superior Roman army at the Battle of Cannae.


No one remembers the great carthaginian empire, and only the odd historian recalls their occasional tactical victories.


The Americans did not consider the worst-case scenario at Pearl Harbor or on September 11, and the results were disastrous for the American people.


We've come out of both stronger and in better shape than the other guy. It is possible to lose battles and still win the war.

It's an allegory for the Chinese waiting until the United States is distracted by other global events, since the Chinese are loath to go head-to-head with a stronger enemy.


Does anyone?

Why should the PRC do something silly like fight for some meaningless spit of land, or... for any other short term goal, all the way up to Taiwan, when their methodological evil plan to world domination(!) via economic means is right on track?

If they want a cake-walk, all they will have to do is wait until 2015 or so when the US won't have enough money to deploy even "advisors" or to sortie COMPACFLT, and all the Chinese have to do is float rumors in the media about raising interest rates or not buying an more US debt to deep six the US economy and government?

#14 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1108 AM

Ok, I'll see your crockery with mockery - let's just say a 50' tall James Carville eats Toledo.

Did you read the linked scenario in the Chinese Aircraft carrier thread, for checkmating the USN?


Oh, I imagined that much, but still leaves the SSGNs and SSNs at large, think of Lybia, just one and a couple of DDGs with some augmentation from the RN shot +100 Tomahawks. That will kill all airbases at Hainan, add B-52s and B-2s to the mix and the PRC airpower in the South China Sea is toasted.

Essentially, the US would need to be neutralised through political means (electing a Chinese President or something like that)

#15 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1109 AM



Why should the PRC do something silly like fight for some meaningless spit of land, or... for any other short term goal, all the way up to Taiwan, when their methodological evil plan to world domination(!) via economic means is right on track?

If they want a cake-walk, all they will have to do is wait until 2015 or so when the US won't have enough money to deploy even "advisors" or to sortie COMPACFLT, and all the Chinese have to do is float rumors in the media about raising interest rates or not buying an more US debt to deep six the US economy and government?


So you're restating a scenario that takes the USN out of the game, which takes us back to Post 1. Thank you.

#16 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1113 AM

Essentially, the US would need to be neutralised through political means (electing a Chinese President or something like that)



Distracted, neutralized, overwhelmed by internal events, or all of the above - it's the sort of asymmetric window of opportunity Beijing would exploit to flex their muscles for the first time in international waters.

Now that we've gotten past that, what did Beijing learn about dynamic action (after getting spanked by the Vietnamese in 1979) that they'd apply roughly forty years later?

#17 Guest_JamesG123_*

Guest_JamesG123_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1126 AM

So you're restating a scenario that takes the USN out of the game, which takes us back to Post 1. Thank you.


U're welcome. :P

Ok,

Chinese corporations move into the Islands with gas drilling equipment, start building airfields and tourist resorts. Large numbers of "volenteer" Chinese national "civilians" migrate to strategic islands complete with prefabricated housing and Walmarts. A PLAN amphibious assault group starts patrolling around the region and a squadron of their new fast attack boats zoom all around and in between them.

Tersely worded diplomatic documents fly, whiny speeches are given at the UN, but that is the extent of the "Spratly Island War".

#18 RETAC21

RETAC21

    A la lealtad y al valor

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12,235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madrid, Spain
  • Interests:Military history in general

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1127 AM

Distracted, neutralized, overwhelmed by internal events, or all of the above - it's the sort of asymmetric window of opportunity Beijing would exploit to flex their muscles for the first time in international waters.

Now that we've gotten past that, what did Beijing learn about dynamic action (after getting spanked by the Vietnamese in 1979) that they'd apply roughly forty years later?


Don't forget they did have a little dustup with the Viets over the Spratlys and came out on top, so "strong words speak louder than... soft words"

http://www.chinapost...am-protests.htm
http://mdn.mainichi....0in116000c.html
http://www.asiaone.c...606-282511.html

This sounds like an epitaph: "Several well-known scholars have called on Vietnam to take the case to the United Nations"

#19 X-Files

X-Files

    1211st Desantsofter Legion

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,276 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1145 AM

so "strong words speak louder than... soft words..."


"...this time".

"The Vietnamese navy will do everything necessary to firmly protect peace and the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Vietnam," foreign ministry spokeswoman Nguyen Phuong Nga said.

http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL3E7GT02620110529

Vietnam will take resolute steps to safeguard local and foreign investors exploring and producing oil and gas in the country's exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, Nguyen Xuan Phuc, chairman of the government office, told a press conference Friday. Phuc is the highest Vietnamese government official to speak publicly about a May 26 incident involving PetroVietnam seismic vessel Binh Minh 2. Vietnam alleges three Chinese patrol boats harrassed the Binh Minh 2, cutting cables it was using to take seismic readings.
http://www.platts.co...eed/Oil/8959662

From 09

Vietnam will introduce six Russian Kilo-class submarines of the news, once again the Western media's attention to this controversial South China Sea waters. Fox News Network that the United States, Viet Nam to introduce "Kilo" submarines, coastal defense capability will enhance the future of Sino-Vietnamese conflict, once at sea, the Chinese navy may no longer prevail. However, experts on the Chinese Navy, "Global Times" reporter said that a powerful navy, instead of relying on the introduction of several pieces of advanced equipment will be able to do so, Vietnam remains a Navy shore-based naval defense, with the powerful position of the Navy far.

http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2009/05/chinese-experts-vietnamese-navy-is-very.html

*
Meanwhile, elsewhere in the Pacific...

Vietnam and Indonesia have agreed to further boost defence and security cooperation during their defence ministers’ talks in Jakarta, Indonesia, on May 18.

Vietnamese Defence Minister Phung Quang Thanh and his Indonesian counterpart Purnomo Yusgiantoro agreed to soon implement the memorandum understanding on defence cooperation signed in October 2010.
http://en.vietnamplu...15/18413.vnplus

:mellow:
I used to know an Australian that referred to the Indonesians as "Klingons".


Purchase of Submarines Considered Urgent
Tuesday, 07 June, 2011 | 13:51 WIB

TEMPO Interactive, Jakarta:Rizal Darmaputra, a military analyst, supports the government’s plan on purchasing battle submarines. “It is very urgent,” he said, contacted yesterday.

He said that the addition to the naval force will fortify the Indonesian military, particularly since Indonesia consists mostly of sea water. In addition, Indonesian waters is a lane used by international shipping companies. A military submarine could become an effective pressure when Indonesia comes into conflict with other nations.


My link

Edited by X-Files, 07 June 2011 - 1151 AM.


#20 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,819 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369°/-84.2675°
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted 07 June 2011 - 1148 AM

Remember why I told you the tag line was applicable? I suppose there were 'experts' mocking Plan Orange, too.



A yup.

But then the contention over the Spratleys is nothing new. Enough hints and you should read the damn tea leaves. There was enough of an example of the Pearl Harbor type attack with the Taranto raid....




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users