Jump to content


Photo

Uss Fitzgerald Collision


  • Please log in to reply
184 replies to this topic

#181 rmgill

rmgill

    Strap-hanger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,972 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:33.8369/-84.2675
  • Interests:WWII Armor, Ferrets, Dingos, Humbers, etc...

Posted Yesterday, 05:04 PM

Gotta have a USS Hornet too..

#182 JasonJ

JasonJ

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 7,689 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 10:08 PM

no big Japanese flat tops until we have Enterprise back serving with the fleet.  No since taking chances...

 

Still, a fine irony if a task force made up of Enterprise and Akagi were launching strikes against North Korea...

 

Well Enterprise is in the plan books while there is technically no plans for a Japanese carrier yet. So USS Enterprise should be commissioned in time.

 

I think by the time both would be in service, the North Korea situation might already have been finished. I feel there is a good chance that it'll be finished next year, either by complete war or by the North Koreans backing down and agreeing to denuclearization. So then, Enterprise and Akagi would be steaming together to maintain the current order of things throughout the Indo-Pacific region.



#183 JasonJ

JasonJ

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 7,689 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 10:11 PM

Gotta have a USS Hornet too..

 

And USS Yorktown. Maybe get them for CVN-82 and CVN-83.

 

Whatever happens, "USS Obama" is forbidden.



#184 MiloMorai

MiloMorai

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted Today, 05:06 PM

Come now JasonJ, would this vessel not be good to name after Obama,

Garbage-barge.jpg



#185 Nobu

Nobu

    Crew

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,423 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 51 minutes ago

I don't think USS Hornet would be appropriate.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users