Kerbal Space Program
Posted 24 February 2013 - 1008 AM
KSP lets you run your own space program on planet Kerbin in a solar system broadly modelled on our own, but with sizes and distances an order of magnitude less for ease of playing and bodies named differently; the Venus analogue is Eve, Mars is Duna, Jupiter is Jool, etc. The Kerbals are little green people with names like Wernher von Kermin, Gene Kerbal, etc. The mood is quite humorous, but physics quite hard, if somewhat simplified; celestial bodies have clearly defined areas of gravitational influence in which only they excert pull, and there is currently (v0.18) no temperature development during atmospheric reentry, though that is announced to be implemented in future versions.
This is still very much a work in progress, and evolved stages are released periodically (at increased prices). However, it has already quite a fan base, with user-developed mods particularly concerning additional parts. KSP lets you assemble rockets and spaceplanes from pre-fabricated modules, then fly them, and learn about rocketry, aerodynamics and orbital mechanics in the course. It is open-ended with no other aims than those you set yourself, though I understand in the career mode of the pay version you can take on challenges to earn money for your program.
It makes for lots of fun, spectacular catastrophic failures on launch pads, and is highly addictive and time-consuming, which is why I haven't attended TankNet (particularly the Russian America thread ...) as much as usual over the last week; my head was literally up in space as I successively mastered getting a rocket off the pad in a straight line, achieving orbit and executing orbital maneuvres. Last night we stayed up until shortly past four until we at last managed to successfully land on the Mün. Well, actually we tore off a landing leg and engine from my aptly-named "Crasher" lander design, but were able to return to Kerbal safely. I need more challenges now, and better parts - my moon rocket looked like a pyramid of fireworks based upon V-2 technology.
Posted 24 February 2013 - 1037 AM
Posted 24 February 2013 - 1102 AM
I'm running a bunch of mods to enhance objectives.
I have a station in low Kerbin orbit.
Mapsats around Kerbin, the Mun, Minimus and Duna
Comsats around Kerbin, the Mun and Duna
Probes down on the Mun, Duna and Minums.
Kerbols on the Mun. Still working on getting a good system to get resource and supplies to them on Duna.
I'm playing with the MechJeb and Crew Transfer/Resource mod now too.
I've done about a hundred dockings by now. It's a fun game. Challenging too.
Edited by rmgill, 24 February 2013 - 1102 AM.
Posted 25 February 2013 - 1023 AM
Posted 01 March 2013 - 0352 AM
My near-term goal is nudging the debris that is cluttering up near-Kerbal space into re-entry trajectories. The upper stage I was targeting already had a perikerbalum of 30 kilometers, but seems not to be affected by atmospheric drag as it keeps going in the same exact orbit. So far I have only suceeded in multiplying debris as I went for it with my Mün lander and foolishly separated my empty descent stage in orbit - consisting of four individual tank/engine units ...
Posted 01 March 2013 - 1332 PM
For Docking. Align your orbital inclination, boost normal or anti-normal at your descending or ascending nodes respectively.
Then if you're behind it get a lower orbit, ahead of it a higher orbit. As your distance gets down, you want to raise/lower your orbit so it's less and less distant in final distance. At less than 10,000km, you want an orbit that's about 5,000 meters different or less.
Once you get things very close aim for the target and thrust gently towards it. you should see things coincide with the orbit markers. If your orbit is a gently crossing orbit that's ok. A velocity differential of 10 or less m/s is easy to deal with. Then as you get less than 1000 meters to your target, reduce your differential down to 2-3 m/s at 500 meters and less as you get closer.
Mech-Jeb is immensely helpful as it'll give you pointers for direction and such. Getting the basics down of washing your orbit first though without mech jeb makes mech jeb much easier to use.
Posted 09 March 2013 - 0918 AM
I need more computing power though.
Posted 11 March 2013 - 0046 AM
Posted 11 March 2013 - 0423 AM
Managed a 30,000 km Duna flyby. Note to self: solar panels are useless if angeled up on top of your probe while oriented away from the sun. Ship went dead before the encounter and was not able to maneuver, then promptly recharged afterwards continueing in solar orbit. Oh well, I wouldn't have had enough delta-v to land anyway. Currently have an improved design with nuclear transfer stage and tracking solar panels in Kerbal orbit waiting for an Eve or Duna window.
Posted 11 March 2013 - 0929 AM
I'm about to start using the crew transfer and resource component to see if I can keep kerbels supplied and eating/living on a trip to Duna and back. So far I'm just getting the bugs worked out of a Kethane mining program on the Mun so I can orbit fuel for a lower to orbit cost.
Mods I'm using regularly.
Docking struts (critical for ships made up of docked components or space stations)
the Bobcat suite of mods (really nice modules)
Interplanetary missions pack
Posted 22 March 2013 - 1313 PM
Can you nuke stuff and smash things together at hypervelocity?
Edited by Jason L, 22 March 2013 - 1314 PM.
Posted 23 March 2013 - 0312 AM
In the Week Without TankNet I got a lot done. Probe down on Eve. Reactivated my failed Duna probe for a close Moho fly-by. Hard landing on Dres. Would have landed on Duna too, but arrived with so much fuel to spare that I decided to make a stint to its moon Ike first. Those little bodies are pretty asymmmetrical, and in periapses of just a few kilometers, you may encounter terrain quite suddenly. Ask me how I know ...
I have designed a manned single-ship planetary lander with a nuclear return stage, which I have only tested on Kerbal so far. Also developed a twin probe to visit planets and their moons in the same mission, which I have tested on Mün-Minmus flights. There are still some problems with stage control after separation - grouping just goes to hell once you split a mission into two ships - but I discovered one of the Mün arches from orbit.
Now that I'm on 0.19.1, I guess my next step will be designing rover probes. Have the week before Easter off, will leave for the family place today to get advise from brother #4 (who infected me with KSP) on a new computer - have a five-year-old Barebone Shuttle with no graphics card, and I'm experiencing time dilatation on interplanetary flights. I swear I'll buy the fastest processor with the biggest honking graphics card that still fit the same format.
Posted 28 March 2013 - 0631 AM
Muhar, 3.1 GHz quad-core processor with GT 640 graphics card. No more time dilatation on interplanetary flights! Plus great detail of spacecraft and landscapes!
I have been fiddling around with sub-probes and rovers. The latter in particular seem still somewhat buggy (no pun intended); if you put them on spacecraft, they tend to run their engines along with the ship's, sucking dry batteries unless you manually stop them (but start them again before you drop them off, or they may not run at all). Also have problems switching back from detached probes to the mothership, as often I am only offered "end flight" rather than "go to space center" as an option on the escape menu - may be I'm forgetting to throttle them down, which is difficult in rovers anyway.
Lessons of the week: carelessly connecting parts of a probe with the mothership it is supposed to detach from will put the whole assembly in unstoppable motion with external solar panels flying off. However, putting a dying probe on a course into Eve's atmosphere with activated parachutes and extended landing struts will result in a perfect landing even with dry batteries (luckily, nothing will currently burn off during re-entry).
Posted 28 March 2013 - 0827 AM
Are you putting some form of command unit on your probes and mini buggies?
Put an RTG on your biggies. MAke sure your staging is correct for them with the Probe's parts above the decoupler in question. Use the blue decouplers if you want the decoupler to come off both objects.
As to power, I like to add a quartet of panels to my transfer stage as well as the panels on the final probes/landers allowing power to be certainly maintained on the whole package during transfer. A couple of batteries is advisable unless you want to go with an RTG.
Edited by rmgill, 28 March 2013 - 0830 AM.
Posted 28 March 2013 - 1050 AM
On my double-stack probes, obviously I put a command unit on each of the pair. After experiencing construction and staging control problems with putting the sub-probe (meant to investigate moons while the main probe goes on to their planet) on top of existing designs, I rearranged parts to build top down from the original CU; since the sub-probe is detached first, unfortunately this means the ship designation stays with it while the main probe (now controlled by the added-on CU) and transfer stage get labeled as a probe. That's not too problematic, since you can rename it and rearrange the messed-up staging controls after separation. However, once the sub-probe is landed, I'm only given the option to end the flight rather than go to the space center and re-select the ship while leaving the secondary mission active.
Same with detached autonomous rovers; there were only two instances where I was able to switch back to the lander, both during tests on Kerbin after I had managed to fully stop the rover by throttling down and putting on the parking brake. The problem here is that rover motors seem to spin all the time from the get go unless you program them into an action group along with the brake, and even though I put rover speed control on my joystick nick axis in the settings, power is still controlled by the thrust lever. I have solved the power problem with RTGs, but it's still nasty. Looking forward to manual control by Kerbalnauts being implemented.
Posted 28 March 2013 - 1101 AM
That's odd. I'd throw a mech-jeb module on there. That or Remote-Tech Relay component. But then Remote-Tech adds it's own host of challenges, like getting a communications relay network up.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users