I wonder how good/bad the Su 76m was.
It seems to me a reasonable vehicle IF used in an infantry support verhicle, and not a s a "true" AFV in assaults. The Infantry seem to have liked it in the firepower it brought to the frontline. The tankers themselves seem to have been dissapointed by its light armour when used as an assault gun in stead of a lightly armoured support gun.
To me the vehicles (with all its shortcomings) seems to be a reasonable attempt to built a usable vehicle for the support role using non vital resources (truck engines, light armour, guns and ammo well established in service and produced in great quantities. Also it could be produced in factories that could not produce mediums and heavies, so otherwise this production capacity would not have been used.
Any toughts ?
Edited by Inhapi, 05 September 2017 - 0757 AM.